tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27813791044011339332024-03-13T10:37:58.921-07:00The Hasbara BusterConfronting false analogy and other Zionist devicesIbrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.comBlogger155125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-43137559695020674472013-12-17T19:15:00.001-08:002013-12-17T19:20:53.331-08:00... when they will love their children more than they hate the ArabsAre you fluent in Hebrew? Check this Facebook posting by Jewish nationalist leader Baruch Marzel
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div id="fb-root">
</div>
<script>(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/es_LA/all.js#xfbml=1"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));</script>
<br />
<div class="fb-post" data-href="https://www.facebook.com/BaruchMarzelOfficial/posts/758306080850123" data-width="466">
<div class="fb-xfbml-parse-ignore">
<a href="https://www.facebook.com/BaruchMarzelOfficial/posts/758306080850123">una publicación</a> por <a href="https://www.facebook.com/BaruchMarzelOfficial">ברוך מרזל-העמוד הרישמי</a>.<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
OK, I can't read Hebrew either, so here's a <a href="http://972mag.com/nstt_feeditem/settlers-prefer-to-freeze-to-death-than-get-help-from-an-arab/">translation</a> by Amy Kaufman:
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<em style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #1e1e1e; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 18px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">“In (the settlement of – A.K.) Yitzhar live righteous people.<br />The Samaria Council sent an Arab bulldozer operator to plow the snow.<br />The residents sent him away. When they were asked to make an exception and compromise just this once because it’s an emergency situation, the residents answered ‘We’ve been without electricity for 3 days and we’re willing to stay another two months without electricity as long as we don’t let the enemy make a living.”</em></blockquote>
<br />
To add some context, a big snowstorm caught Israel unprepared, just like the Mount Carmel fire of 2010 had done, largely because the money Israel could devote to civil defense is instead spent on deadly weapons. The storm affected the lives of both its legal citizens and the illegal Jewish squatters in the West Bank. But the latter would rather leave their own children without power than allow an Arab help them.<br />
<br />
Yet the Jews are the ones supposed to educate their children for peace, even as the Arabs educate theirs for hate of the Jews. Now what would you expect this Arab bulldozer operator to tell his children? Of course he should tell them to love the Jews. His teachings could go along these lines:<br />
<br />
"Dear children, today I was turned down by the Jews of Yitzhar when I tried to clear their streets of snow because I'm an Arab. However, you should not hate the Jews. It is true that these particular Jews get generous subsidies as well as military support from the government of Israel, which was overwhelmingly elected by Israeli Jews and is ardently supported by organized Jewish communities worldwide. But there are Jews who are not racist -- non-observant Jews disowned by their Jewish communities, attacked by their journals, mostly intermarried, who are sympathetic to the cause of the oppressed Palestinian people. Because of these Jews who no one in their right mind would consider to be even remotely representative of the Jewish people, you should not hate the Jews."Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com10tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-13925507597971392772013-03-13T11:55:00.001-07:002013-03-13T11:59:29.298-07:00"To be expected from Arabs"The Jerusalem Post has a <a href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=305908">story</a> about a girl, aged 16, from the Israeli Arab city of Nazareth who was attacked by a 51-year-old man who happened to be a relative and neighbor of hers. The man was indicted, along with an accomplice, for spilling acid on her face some <a href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#comment-807852288">twenty days ago</a> after learning she was to marry a Jordanian man. The two had been, according to the indictment, sexually abusing the girl for the last few months.<br />
<br />
The tragedy seems to be a very welcome piece of news for the Jerusalem Post's commentariat. They are especially excited that it's Israeli Arabs who are involved in this crime. A selection of the comments follows:<br />
<br />
<span class="publisher-anchor-color" style="box-sizing: border-box;"><a data-action="profile" data-user="334578" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=305908#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(0, 0, 238) !important; font-family: inherit; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;">lnfidel</a></span> <span aria-hidden="true" class="bullet" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; font-size: 9px; line-height: 1.4; padding: 0px 3px;">•</span> <a class="time-ago" data-role="relative-time" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=305908#comment-824617157" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;" title="Sunday, March 10 2013 9:52 AM">3 days ago</a><br />
<br />
<header style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #777777; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 16px; position: relative;"><ul class="post-menu" style="-webkit-transition: 0.2s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: right; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; list-style: none; margin: 0px; opacity: 1; padding: 0px; position: relative; top: -2px; visibility: visible !important;">
<li class="collapse" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; margin: 0px 0px 0px 8px; padding: 0px;"><a data-action="collapse" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=305908#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.498039) !important; font-family: inherit; font-size: 20px; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; opacity: 0.6; padding: 10px 0px 10px 10px; position: relative; text-decoration: none; top: -7px;" title="Collapse">−</a></li>
<li class="dropdown" data-role="menu" role="menu" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; margin: 0px 0px 0px 8px; padding: 0px; position: relative;"><a class="dropdown-toggle" data-toggle="dropdown" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=305908#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border-left-color: rgba(75, 83, 94, 0.360784); border-left-style: dotted; border-width: 0px 0px 0px 1px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.498039) !important; font-family: inherit; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px; text-decoration: none;"><b class="caret" style="border-left-color: transparent; border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 4px; border-right-color: transparent; border-right-style: solid; border-right-width: 4px; border-top-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-top-style: solid; border-top-width: 4px; box-sizing: border-box; content: ↓; display: inline-block; height: 0px; margin-left: 2px; margin-top: 4px; opacity: 0.3; text-indent: -99999px; vertical-align: top; width: 0px;"></b></a></li>
</ul>
</header><br />
<div class="post-message-container" data-role="message-container" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #444444; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 14px; position: relative;">
<div data-role="message-content" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="post-message publisher-anchor-color " data-role="message" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; margin-bottom: 9px; padding: 0px;">
"She also said that her daughter had recently become engaged to a student living in Jordan shortly before the attack began."</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; padding: 0px;">
"Gag order" or not, everything, including the above quoted text in the article, points to "the religion of peace", as the probability of a Jew or Christian getting engaged to someone in Jorden, has to be diminishingly small.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<footer style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: both; color: #6c6c6c; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1.85; margin: 4px 0px 0px;"><menu style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<li class="realtime" data-role="realtime-notification:824617157" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: right; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></li>
<li class="voting" data-role="voting" style="-webkit-transition: opacity 0.3s; border-bottom-left-radius: 3px; border-bottom-right-radius: 3px; border-top-left-radius: 3px; border-top-right-radius: 3px; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative;"><a class="vote-up " data-action="upvote" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=305908#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; height: 11px; line-height: 0.85; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 4px 0px 0px; position: relative; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: middle;" title="Vote up"><span class="updatable count count-14" data-role="likes" style="-webkit-transition: all 0.3s linear; box-sizing: border-box;">14</span> <span class="control" style="-webkit-transition: opacity 0.2s linear; border-bottom-color: rgb(73, 94, 111); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-color: transparent; border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-color: transparent; border-right-style: solid; border-right-width: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 13px; opacity: 0.7; vertical-align: middle;"><i aria-hidden="true" class="icon-arrow-2" style="box-sizing: border-box;"></i></span></a> <a class="vote-down " data-action="downvote" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=305908#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border-left-color: rgba(75, 83, 94, 0.360784); border-left-style: dotted; border-width: 0px 0px 0px 1px; box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; height: 11px; line-height: 0.85; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 6px; position: relative; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: middle;" title="Vote down"><span class="control" style="-webkit-transition: opacity 0.2s linear; border-left-color: transparent; border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-color: transparent; border-right-style: solid; border-right-width: 0px; border-top-color: rgb(73, 94, 111); border-top-style: solid; border-top-width: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 13px; opacity: 0.7; vertical-align: middle;"><i aria-hidden="true" class="icon-arrow" style="box-sizing: border-box;"></i></span></a></li>
<li aria-hidden="true" class="bullet" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 8px; line-height: 1.6; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px;">•</li>
<li class="reply" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px;"><a data-action="reply" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=305908#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #999999; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;">Reply</a></li>
<li aria-hidden="true" class="bullet" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 8px; line-height: 1.6; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px;">•</li>
<li class="share" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative;"><a class="toggle" href="http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=2781379104401133933" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #999999; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative; z-index: 1000;">Share ›</a></li>
</menu></footer><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<header style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #777777; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 16px; position: relative;"><span class="publisher-anchor-color" style="box-sizing: border-box;"><a data-action="profile" data-user="27858710" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(0, 0, 238) !important; font-family: inherit; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;">Joseph</a></span> <span style="box-sizing: border-box;"><a class="parent-link" data-role="parent-link" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#comment-807720175" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative; text-decoration: none;"><i aria-hidden="true" class="icon-forward" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 9px; padding: 0px 1px;" title="in reply to"></i> NoRighty</a></span> <span aria-hidden="true" class="bullet" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; font-size: 9px; line-height: 1.4; padding: 0px 3px;">•</span> <a class="time-ago" data-role="relative-time" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#comment-808086549" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;" title="Friday, February 22 2013 5:04 AM">19 days ago</a><ul class="post-menu" style="-webkit-transition: 0.2s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: right; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; list-style: none; margin: 0px; opacity: 0; padding: 0px; position: relative; top: -2px; visibility: hidden;">
<li class="collapse" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; margin: 0px 0px 0px 8px; padding: 0px;"><a data-action="collapse" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.498039) !important; font-family: inherit; font-size: 20px; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; opacity: 0.6; padding: 10px 0px 10px 10px; position: relative; text-decoration: none; top: -7px;" title="Collapse"></a></li>
<li class="dropdown" data-role="menu" role="menu" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; margin: 0px 0px 0px 8px; padding: 0px; position: relative;"><a class="dropdown-toggle" data-toggle="dropdown" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border-left-color: rgba(75, 83, 94, 0.360784); border-left-style: dotted; border-width: 0px 0px 0px 1px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.498039) !important; font-family: inherit; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px; text-decoration: none;"><b class="caret" style="border-left-color: transparent; border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 4px; border-right-color: transparent; border-right-style: solid; border-right-width: 4px; border-top-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-top-style: solid; border-top-width: 4px; box-sizing: border-box; content: ↓; display: inline-block; height: 0px; margin-left: 2px; margin-top: 4px; opacity: 0.3; text-indent: -99999px; vertical-align: top; width: 0px;"></b></a></li>
</ul>
</header><br />
<div class="post-message-container" data-role="message-container" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #444444; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 14px; position: relative;">
<div data-role="message-content" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="post-message publisher-anchor-color " data-role="message" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; padding: 0px;">
If her finace is Jordanian it's more likely she's Muslim. The acid attack tends to be in Muslim societies.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<footer style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: both; color: #6c6c6c; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1.85; margin: 4px 0px 0px;"><menu style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<li class="realtime" data-role="realtime-notification:808086549" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: right; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></li>
<li class="voting" data-role="voting" style="-webkit-transition: opacity 0.3s; border-bottom-left-radius: 3px; border-bottom-right-radius: 3px; border-top-left-radius: 3px; border-top-right-radius: 3px; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative;"><a class="vote-up " data-action="upvote" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; height: 11px; line-height: 0.85; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 4px 0px 0px; position: relative; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: middle;" title="Vote up"><span class="updatable count count-12" data-role="likes" style="-webkit-transition: all 0.3s linear; box-sizing: border-box;">12</span> <span class="control" style="-webkit-transition: opacity 0.2s linear; border-bottom-color: rgb(73, 94, 111); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-color: transparent; border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-color: transparent; border-right-style: solid; border-right-width: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 13px; opacity: 0.7; vertical-align: middle;"><i aria-hidden="true" class="icon-arrow-2" style="box-sizing: border-box;"></i></span></a> <a class="vote-down " data-action="downvote" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border-left-color: rgba(75, 83, 94, 0.360784); border-left-style: dotted; border-width: 0px 0px 0px 1px; box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; height: 11px; line-height: 0.85; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 6px; position: relative; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: middle;" title="Vote down"><span class="control" style="-webkit-transition: opacity 0.2s linear; border-left-color: transparent; border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-color: transparent; border-right-style: solid; border-right-width: 0px; border-top-color: rgb(73, 94, 111); border-top-style: solid; border-top-width: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 13px; opacity: 0.7; vertical-align: middle;"><i aria-hidden="true" class="icon-arrow" style="box-sizing: border-box;"></i></span></a></li>
<li aria-hidden="true" class="bullet" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 8px; line-height: 1.6; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px;">•</li>
<li class="reply" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px;"><a data-action="reply" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #999999; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;">Reply</a></li>
<li aria-hidden="true" class="bullet" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 8px; line-height: 1.6; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px;">•</li>
<li class="share" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative;"><a class="toggle" href="http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=2781379104401133933" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #999999; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative; z-index: 1000;">Share ›</a></li>
</menu></footer><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<header style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #777777; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 16px; position: relative;"><span class="publisher-anchor-color" style="box-sizing: border-box;"><a data-action="profile" data-user="1211577" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(0, 0, 238) !important; font-family: inherit; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;">Mickey Oberman</a></span> <span aria-hidden="true" class="bullet" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; font-size: 9px; line-height: 1.4; padding: 0px 3px;">•</span> <a class="time-ago" data-role="relative-time" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#comment-807888704" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;" title="Friday, February 22 2013 1:12 AM">20 days ago</a><ul class="post-menu" style="-webkit-transition: 0.2s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: right; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; list-style: none; margin: 0px; opacity: 1; padding: 0px; position: relative; top: -2px; visibility: visible !important;">
<li class="collapse" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; margin: 0px 0px 0px 8px; padding: 0px;"><a data-action="collapse" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.498039) !important; font-family: inherit; font-size: 20px; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; opacity: 0.6; padding: 10px 0px 10px 10px; position: relative; text-decoration: none; top: -7px;" title="Collapse">−</a></li>
<li class="dropdown" data-role="menu" role="menu" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; margin: 0px 0px 0px 8px; padding: 0px; position: relative;"><a class="dropdown-toggle" data-toggle="dropdown" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border-left-color: rgba(75, 83, 94, 0.360784); border-left-style: dotted; border-width: 0px 0px 0px 1px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.498039) !important; font-family: inherit; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px; text-decoration: none;"><b class="caret" style="border-left-color: transparent; border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 4px; border-right-color: transparent; border-right-style: solid; border-right-width: 4px; border-top-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-top-style: solid; border-top-width: 4px; box-sizing: border-box; content: ↓; display: inline-block; height: 0px; margin-left: 2px; margin-top: 4px; opacity: 0.3; text-indent: -99999px; vertical-align: top; width: 0px;"></b></a></li>
</ul>
</header><br />
<div class="post-message-container" data-role="message-container" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #444444; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 14px; position: relative;">
<div data-role="message-content" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="post-message publisher-anchor-color " data-role="message" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; padding: 0px;">
Wooing Muslim style.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<footer style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: both; color: #6c6c6c; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1.85; margin: 4px 0px 0px;"><menu style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<li class="realtime" data-role="realtime-notification:807888704" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: right; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></li>
<li class="voting" data-role="voting" style="-webkit-transition: opacity 0.3s; border-bottom-left-radius: 3px; border-bottom-right-radius: 3px; border-top-left-radius: 3px; border-top-right-radius: 3px; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative;"><a class="vote-up " data-action="upvote" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; height: 11px; line-height: 0.85; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 4px 0px 0px; position: relative; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: middle;" title="Vote up"><span class="updatable count count-24" data-role="likes" style="-webkit-transition: all 0.3s linear; box-sizing: border-box;">24</span> <span class="control" style="-webkit-transition: opacity 0.2s linear; border-bottom-color: rgb(73, 94, 111); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-color: transparent; border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-color: transparent; border-right-style: solid; border-right-width: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 13px; opacity: 0.7; vertical-align: middle;"><i aria-hidden="true" class="icon-arrow-2" style="box-sizing: border-box;"></i></span></a> <a class="vote-down " data-action="downvote" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border-left-color: rgba(75, 83, 94, 0.360784); border-left-style: dotted; border-width: 0px 0px 0px 1px; box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; height: 11px; line-height: 0.85; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 6px; position: relative; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: middle;" title="Vote down"><span class="updatable count count-1" data-role="dislikes" style="-webkit-transition: all 0.3s linear; box-sizing: border-box;">1</span> <span class="control" style="-webkit-transition: opacity 0.2s linear; border-left-color: transparent; border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-color: transparent; border-right-style: solid; border-right-width: 0px; border-top-color: rgb(73, 94, 111); border-top-style: solid; border-top-width: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 13px; opacity: 0.7; vertical-align: middle;"><i aria-hidden="true" class="icon-arrow" style="box-sizing: border-box;"></i></span></a></li>
<li aria-hidden="true" class="bullet" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 8px; line-height: 1.6; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px;">•</li>
<li class="reply" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px;"><a data-action="reply" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #999999; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;">Reply</a></li>
<li aria-hidden="true" class="bullet" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 8px; line-height: 1.6; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px;">•</li>
<li class="share" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative;"><a class="toggle" href="http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=2781379104401133933" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #999999; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative; z-index: 1000;">Share ›</a></li>
</menu></footer><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<header style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #777777; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 16px; position: relative;"><span class="publisher-anchor-color" style="box-sizing: border-box;"><a data-action="profile" data-user="30146135" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(0, 0, 238) !important; font-family: inherit; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;">leo Deutsch</a></span> <span aria-hidden="true" class="bullet" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; font-size: 9px; line-height: 1.4; padding: 0px 3px;">•</span> <a class="time-ago" data-role="relative-time" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#comment-807852288" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;" title="Friday, February 22 2013 12:45 AM">20 days ago</a><ul class="post-menu" style="-webkit-transition: 0.2s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: right; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; list-style: none; margin: 0px; opacity: 0; padding: 0px; position: relative; top: -2px; visibility: hidden;">
<li class="collapse" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; margin: 0px 0px 0px 8px; padding: 0px;"><a data-action="collapse" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.498039) !important; font-family: inherit; font-size: 20px; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; opacity: 0.6; padding: 10px 0px 10px 10px; position: relative; text-decoration: none; top: -7px;" title="Collapse"></a></li>
<li class="dropdown" data-role="menu" role="menu" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; line-height: 1; margin: 0px 0px 0px 8px; padding: 0px; position: relative;"><a class="dropdown-toggle" data-toggle="dropdown" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border-left-color: rgba(75, 83, 94, 0.360784); border-left-style: dotted; border-width: 0px 0px 0px 1px; box-sizing: border-box; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.498039) !important; font-family: inherit; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px; text-decoration: none;"><b class="caret" style="border-left-color: transparent; border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 4px; border-right-color: transparent; border-right-style: solid; border-right-width: 4px; border-top-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-top-style: solid; border-top-width: 4px; box-sizing: border-box; content: ↓; display: inline-block; height: 0px; margin-left: 2px; margin-top: 4px; opacity: 0.3; text-indent: -99999px; vertical-align: top; width: 0px;"></b></a></li>
</ul>
</header><br />
<div class="post-message-container" data-role="message-container" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #444444; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 14px; position: relative;">
<div data-role="message-content" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="post-message publisher-anchor-color " data-role="message" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; padding: 0px;">
to be expected from arabs!!!!!!!!!!!!</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
<footer style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: both; color: #6c6c6c; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1.85; margin: 4px 0px 0px;"><menu style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<li class="realtime" data-role="realtime-notification:807852288" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: right; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a class="vote-up " data-action="upvote" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; height: 11px; line-height: 0.85; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 4px 0px 0px; position: relative; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: middle;" title="Vote up"><span class="updatable count count-13" data-role="likes" style="-webkit-transition: all 0.3s linear; box-sizing: border-box;">13</span> <span class="control" style="-webkit-transition: opacity 0.2s linear; border-bottom-color: rgb(73, 94, 111); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-color: transparent; border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-color: transparent; border-right-style: solid; border-right-width: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 13px; opacity: 0.7; vertical-align: middle;"><i aria-hidden="true" class="icon-arrow-2" style="box-sizing: border-box;"></i></span></a> </li>
<li aria-hidden="true" class="bullet" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 8px; line-height: 1.6; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px;">•</li>
<li class="reply" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px;"><a data-action="reply" href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=304120#" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #999999; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;">Reply</a></li>
<li aria-hidden="true" class="bullet" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cccccc; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 8px; line-height: 1.6; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px;">•</li>
<li class="share" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; float: left; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative;"><a class="toggle" href="http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=2781379104401133933" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.1s linear; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #999999; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative; z-index: 1000;">Share ›</a></li>
</menu></footer><br />
<br />
<br />
The girl was taken for attention to the Ramban Medical Center. David Ratner, the director of public affairs and spokesman for the Center, asserted:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
This is something more fitting to Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan. It’s not something people expect here.</blockquote>
<br />
Pick any day of any week of any month of the year and the country where the largest amount of acid-attack stories comes from is, far and away, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=%22acid+attackW&oq=%22acid+attackW&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i53.4905.9346.0.9744.13.4.0.9.0.0.193.593.1j3.4.0...0.0...1ac.1.5v0nQ5tHhZM#q=%22acid+attack%22+-bolshoi&hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&ei=KLxAUfqnJoqC9QTNh4GgDw&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.43287494,d.eWU&fp=bb92e781cc9b1aa1&biw=1280&bih=923">India</a>. The crime is so endemic in the country that an <a href="http://www.stopacidattacks.org/p/our-demands.html">organization</a> exists exclusively devoted to stopping it. So why would Mr. Ratner name three other countries as those to which acid attacks are "more fitting"? Maybe he had some religion in mind?<br />
<br />
Mr. Ratner's assessment only adds to the misinformation spread by the mainstream media, which usually carries stories, complete with gruesome pictures, of women splashed with acid in Muslim countries, while largely ignoring the prevalence of the crime in the whole of South and Southeast Asia, as well as several African countries like Nigeria, Zimbabwe and South Africa. I leave it to the reader to do the Googling for themselves.<br />
<br />
Perhaps more to the point, you're not likely to learn from Western media about acid attacks among Israeli Jews -- but they exist. On 5 June 2008, Ynet <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3552461,00.html">reported</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
A 14-year-old girl from Beitar Illite was taken to the Hadassah Ein Kerem Hospital in Jerusalem after an unknown person spilled acid on her face, legs and stomach, causing light burn wounds.
The act has been attributed to a representative of the so-called 'modesty guard' in this town where religious and secular residents are increasingly at bitter odds.</blockquote>
<br />
The story describes how the attackers mistook the girl for her sister, who had been warned by the "modesty patrol" not to wear "immodest" clothing. Unlike in the case of the Nazareth attack, which had nothing to do with religion and everything to do with lust, the Betar Ilit attack was perpetrated because of the criminals' Jewish belief that women should go around modestly dressed. It's true that not all Jews think alike, but it is also true that the Jews who don't haven't made a credible effort to stop the fanatics within their religion. Evil prevails where good people do nothing.<br />
<br />
Curiously enough, I haven't seen any follow-up stories about the Betar Ilit girl, or any description of how she was left after the attack, or, of course, any pictures. While conspiracy theories are not my weakness, one can't help but notice a failure on the media's part to adequately investigate this Jew-on-Jew acid attack.<br />
<br />
By way of another example, a fresh intra-Jewish acid attack was reported only yesterday by <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4355259,00.html">Ynet</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
<b>Teen pours acid on his sister in Kiryat Ono mall</b>
Investigators say attack result of long-standing dispute between the two; sister suffers light facial burns </blockquote>
<br />
So that despite Mr. Ratner's inability to fathom an acid attack in Israel, it has happened and it happens, be it for religious reasons or as part of family disputes. It is something to be expected not only from Arabs but also from many other peoples in the Asian and African continents, including Hindus, Cambodians, Christian Nigerians and -- Jews.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-80680498806673826762013-03-11T08:30:00.001-07:002013-03-11T08:45:50.270-07:00CAMERA in need of more correction (or: a bad day for the MLK quote)In my previous <a href="http://thehasbarabuster.blogspot.com.ar/2013/03/the-hasbara-buster-forces-camera.html">entry</a>, I related how CAMERA, the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, had to take back their assertion that Martin Luther King had said his famous, but disputed, quote equating anti-Zionism to antisemitism in 1968. Their current <a href="http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=8&x_article=369">correction</a> reads:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
<b>Clarification:</b>
An earlier version of this article attributed Dr. King’s comment to a 1968 appearance at Harvard. To clarify, professor Seymour Martin Lipset and Congressman John Lewis, a disciple and associate of Dr. King, both point out that the comment was made shortly before King’s death, but did not name the precise date. Lipset asserted the comment was made in Cambridge, Mass., and Lewis cited Harvard University as the location.</blockquote>
<br />
So that CAMERA is currently saying that King said the quote in Harvard, albeit on an unspecified date.<br />
<br />
Enter Martin Kramer, an Israeli professor very much worried that Wikipedia lists the quote as disputed. In a well-documented <a href="http://www.martinkramer.org/sandbox/2012/03/in-the-words-of-martin-luther-king/">article</a>, Kramer proved that Martin Luther King traveled to Boston in October 1967 on a fundraiser and was invited to Marty Peretz's house in Cambridge, together with his aide Andrew Young, who would later become the US's Ambassador to the UN and the mayor of Atlanta. It was there, Kramer asserts, that King said the quote. In his words: "We now have a date, an approximate time of day, and a street address for the Cambridge dinner, all attested by contemporary documents." Kramer goes on to state:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
And just to run the contemporary record against memory, <b>I wrote to Peretz, to ask whether the much-quoted exchange did take place at his Cambridge home on that evening almost 45 years ago.</b> His answer: “Absolutely.” I’ve written twice to Andrew Young to ask whether he has any recollection of the episode. I haven’t yet received a response.
<br />
So will the guardians of Wikiquote redeem this quote from the purgatory of “disputed”?</blockquote>
<br />
To put things in context, Marty Peretz is a well-known Zionist fanatic and anti-Muslim bigot, who has resorted to <a href="http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/a-martin-peretz-apology/">dishonesty</a> to advance his cause. "Lying for the crown" is a behavior one would expect from him. The fact that Andy Young hasn't corroborated the quote doesn't help either (although even if he had it wouldn't mean much; after 45 years, memories tend to be blurred: personal recollections about issues one is not very much involved with are not usually reliable).<br />
<br />
But remember, CAMERA quoted Congressman John Lewis, a disciple and associate of Dr. King, as also confirming the quote, in an article first published in the San Francisco Chronicle which eventually was adopted by the US Congress and made its way into the Congressional Record, V. 148, Pt. 1, January 23, 2002 to February 13 2002. In that article, Lewis <a href="http://books.google.com.ar/books?id=aPAwhOGUggQC&pg=PA426&dq=During+an+appearance+at+Harvard+University+shortly+before+his+death&hl=en&sa=X&ei=q_Q9UdqjF-SQ0QGkgYHYBA&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=During%20an%20appearance%20at%20Harvard%20University%20shortly%20before%20his%20death&f=false">states</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
<b>During an appearance at Harvard University </b>shortly before his death, a student stood up and asked King to address himself to the issue of Zionism. The question was clearly hostile. King responded, “When people criticize Zionists they mean Jews, you are talking anti-Semitism.”</blockquote>
<br />
So that Kramer claims that the quote was said at a dinner at Marty Peretz's home, while Lewis claims it was said at Harvard. If one is right, the other is wrong, and vice-versa. What we have here is what appears to be a number of people interested in supporting a pro-Israel narrative (Kramer, Peretz and Lipset out of ideological motives; Lewis because he needs the money of his Jewish donors), all claiming that Martin Luther King Jr. equated anti-Zionism to antisemitism, but unable to get their act together as regards the details.<br />
<br />
I expect CAMERA to clarify this mess; as long as they don't, the world has every right to doubt the authenticity of MLK's quote, and Wikipedia is fully justified to describe it as disputed.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com16tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-54188608153181861202013-03-02T11:29:00.001-08:002013-03-02T12:28:14.967-08:00The Hasbara Buster forces CAMERA correctionOn January 21, 2009, I wrote a <a href="http://thehasbarabuster.blogspot.com.ar/2009/01/my-father-once-heard-mlk-denounce.html">post</a> about Martin Luther King's alleged quote, “When people criticize Zionists,
they mean Jews. You are talking anti-Semitism.” The phrase, allegedly said by King to an anti-Zionist black student, is likely an invention of an arch-Zionist by the name of Seymour Lipset, who published it after King's death without providing a single verifiable detail. Lipset didn't specify when or where or to whom the phrase was uttered. In my post, I stated:
<br />
<blockquote>
Do we have further details from other sources? Well, yes; <a href="http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=8&x_article=369">CAMERA</a> claims that King's words were pronounced "in a 1968 appearance at Harvard." Is that so? Er no. On the day of his death, the Harvard Crimson (the university's students' paper) <a href="http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=157725">reported</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
The Rev. Martin Luther King was last in Cambridge almost exactly a year ago--April 23, 1967.</blockquote>
<br />
So that CAMERA is wrong on this (which, by the way, debunks the often-made claim "CAMERA may be biased but it's always factually correct"). All other references to the King quote are either explicitly based on Lipset's article or verbatim transcriptions without attribution.</blockquote>
<br />
The <a href="http://archive.org/web/web.php">Wayback machine</a> is a site that stores screenshots of webpages from all over the Internet. The sites are periodically scanned for changes, so that given a certain page you can know the full history of changes made to it. Up to 17 June 2009, the CAMERA page I linked to contained the wrong information that the King quote came from a 1968 appearance at Harvard, as can be seen in the <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20090617204017/http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=8&x_article=369">Wayback snapshot from that day</a>.<br />
<br />
Then on <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20090617204017/http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=8&x_article=369">26 February 2010</a> the CAMERA page was modified. The reference to the exact year of the King quote was deleted, and the following text was inserted:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
<b><i>Clarification:</i></b><br />
<i>An earlier version of this article attributed Dr. King’s comment
to a 1968 appearance at Harvard. To clarify, professor Seymour Martin</i> <i>Lipset
and Congressman John Lewis, a disciple and associate of Dr. King, both
point out that the comment was made in Cambridge shortly before King’s
death, and did not name the precise date and venue.</i></blockquote>
<br />
To the best of my knowledge, no one had called out CAMERA over its inaccuracy before I did. I think I'm not wrong if I say that it was my post which forced CAMERA to correct itself.<br />
<br />
Is this important? Yes, it is important, because it proves that CAMERA does not check its statements for accuracy, and because that leaves us with no concrete detail, let alone solid evidence, as regards the claim that MLK ever equated anti-Zionism to antisemitism.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-32543085095205010552013-02-25T10:34:00.000-08:002013-02-25T13:13:31.320-08:00Deconstructing the blood-libel chargeFor there to exist a blood libel certain key elements must concur. There must exist a reference to some gruesome practice (not necessarily involving blood, which can reasonably not be taken literally, but brutal and disgusting in any event), and it must be asserted that such a practice is carried out by individuals because they belong to a certain group.<br />
<br />
But that alone is not enough to configure a blood libel. You can claim that a certain group does outrageous things as part of their traditions and the claim still be true. For instance, ultra-Orthodox Jews in New York have a mohel (ritual circumcisor) lick their newborn sons' blood after their foreskin is cut -- a procedure that has sometimes transmitted herpes to the babies, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/09/03/rabbis-will-defy-law-on-circumcision-ritual/">two of which have died</a>, while another two were left with irreversible brain damage. If I report on this barbaric procedure, it paints the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community in a very bad light, but it's not a blood libel, because while the element of blood is present, the element of libel is not.<br />
<br />
This has not deterred Zionists and other Israel apologists from describing as blood libels what actually are uncomfortable truths about Israel or the organized Jewish community. Any suggestion that the Israeli army was complicit in the Sabra and Shatila massacres, for instance, is described as a blood libel, even when it is quite reasonable to ask how a paramilitary group could enter a camp without the regular army controlling the zone (i.e., Israel's) giving its consent. (On the other hand, the country of Poland is perpetually chastised for allowing its Jews to be murdered by the Nazis, even when they, unlike the Israelis at Sabra and Shatila, would have been themselves killed if they had tried to stop the massacres. The suggestion that the whole country is partly responsible for the Holocaust is not considered a blood libel in this case.)<br />
<br />
In a recent <a href="http://www.fathomjournal.org/policy-politics/alibi-antisemitism/2/">article</a> on a site called Fathom, Norman Geras again makes the blood-libel charge against British writer Caryl Churchill, whose play <i>Seven Jewish children -- A play for Gaza</i> purports to describe the way Israeli Jewish children are raised. In the work, written in the context of the Cast Lead operation of 2008-2009, several parents discuss what to tell their children about that unequal war. Geras:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
<div style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: 'Minion Pro', 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px 0px 1em; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<b>This play puts into Jewish mouths the view that Palestinians are ‘animals’ and that ‘they want their children killed to make people sorry for them’</b>; but that there is no need to feel sorry for them; that we – the Jews – are the chosen people and that it is our safety and our children that matter; <b>in sum, that ‘I wouldn’t care if we wiped them out’</b>. I will not insist here on how this echoes the blood libel; it is enough that Churchill ascribes to the Jews, seeing themselves as chosen, murderous racist attitudes bordering on the genocidal. On the face of it, one would think, this is a clear candidate for antisemitic discourse.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: 'Minion Pro', 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px 0px 1em; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Churchill, however, disavowed that charge when it came from critics. She did so on the grounds of what one might call an innocent mind. No antisemitism had been intended by her. On the one hand, <b>the blood libel analogy</b><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2011/mar/04/antisemitism-feeding-homeless-cctv-hamlet" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.2s ease-in; color: #f59940;" target="_blank">had not been part of her thinking</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>when she wrote the play; on the other hand, those speaking the offending lines in it were<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2011/mar/08/get-carter-accents-maypoles-spinal-tap" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.2s ease-in; color: #f59940;" target="_blank">not meant to be Jews in general</a>, merely individual Israelis. Churchill is evidently innocent here of any memory of the figure of Shylock in<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i>The Merchant of Venice</i>, long thought of, despite his being only one character, as putting Jews in a bad light. She is innocent, too, of her own generalising tendencies in naming her play ‘Seven<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i>Jewish</i><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>Children’ and then linking the broad themes of the Jews as victims of genocide and as putative perpetrators of it in their turn.</div>
</blockquote>
<br />
Note how casually Geras takes it as a given that Churchill's descriptions amount to a blood libel. After misrepresenting Churchill's answers to her critics, Geras compares her text to <i>The Merchant of Venice</i>, in which a true blood libel is made. In the Shakespeare play, the Jewish character of Shylock lends money to a man on condition that he will remove a pound of flesh from the borrower's body if the loan is not paid back. When the debt is not honored, Shylock intends to carry out his barbaric vengeance, until he is shamed in court by a young Christian lady disguised as a lawyer.<br />
<br />
There is no historical evidence that Jewish money lenders ever did this because they were Jewish. If there was, it would not be a blood libel. But there is none.<br />
<br />
Churchill's assertions, on the other hand, accurately reflect views widely held by Jews, including those whose writings heavily influence other Jews. Some Jewish parents in her play, in fact, want to tell their children that the Palestinians are "animals" and that ‘they want their children killed to make people sorry for them’, as Geras correctly notes. Some other of the Jewish parents in the play won't care if the Palestinians are wiped out. But are these claims outlandish? Let's see.<br />
<br />
1) With regard to the view that Palestinians are animals, Moshe Feiglin, who became a Knesset member in the last election, has <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/01/what-the-likuds-14th-ranked-knesset-candidate-thinks-of-arabs/266766/">said</a> "<b>You can't teach a monkey to speak and you can't teach an Arab to be democratic.</b> You're dealing with a culture of thieves and robbers. Muhammad, their prophet, was a robber and a killer and a liar. The Arab destroys everything he touches." Here we have a direct analogy to animals, as well as other dehumanizing statements, made by a politician from Likud, the party in power in Israel. Also, Ovadia Yosef, the leader of the Sephardi party Shas, has <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1270038.stm">called</a> Arabs "vipers." <br />
<br />
But it is not high-profile leaders alone who make such comparisons. The rank-and-file think-tank writer also chips in frequently, in op-eds as well as in position papers, stripping the Arabs of any sign of humanity. In a recent Jerusalem Post story, Martin Sherman <a href="http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=303349">wrote</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
To employ a rather stark metaphor – and without wishing to impute canine qualities to humans of any kind, <b>if one insists that one’s antagonists are “cuddly poodles” rather than “vicious rottweilers,” one cannot expect others to understand why “rottweiler” action is appropriate</b>.
<br />
Clearly, however,<b> Israeli diplomats cannot portray Palestinian society in its true light: as a cruel, brutal society</b> where women are suppressed, gays are oppressed and political dissidents are repressed; a society where journalists are harassed, press freedom is trampled, political opponents are lynched, honor killings of women by their male relatives are endorsed or at least condoned, and homosexuals are hounded.
<br />
That must be left to civil society intellectual warriors.</blockquote>
<br />
After carefully distancing himself from ascribing to the Arabs the qualities of an attack dog, Sherman proceeds to recommend that Palestinians be treated like attack dogs. He then dehumanizes the Palestinians by describing their society as one of purely barbarian behavior, suppressing any possibility that parents can be caring or that the people can love each other. It's as if someone stated that Israel is a country where Arabs are lynched, civil marriage is not allowed by law, the interior minister says that gays are sick and state-paid rabbis forbid their followers from renting houses to Arabs -- all of which are true, but do not tell the whole story.<br />
<br />
2) With regard to the view that the Palestinians ‘want their children killed to make people sorry for them’, it has long been mainstream thinking in Zionist circles. Über-Zionist Alan Dershowitz <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/hamas-tactic-require-isra_b_2159321.html">wrote</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
In order <b>to maximize their own civilian casualties, and thereby earn the sympathy of the international community and media</b>, Hamas leaders deliberately fire their rockets from densely populated civilian areas. The Hamas fighters hide in underground bunkers but Hamas refuses to provide any shelter for its own civilians, who they use as "human shields."</blockquote>
<br />
Dershowitz (indisputably one of the most influential Jewish writers as regards the I/P conflict) says almost word by word what Churchill makes the Jews say in her play. Geras must be perfectly aware of this article (and of the several ones in a similar vein that Dershowitz has published over the years), yet I don't recall him (or anyone in the organized Jewish community) calling out Dershowitz for that outrageous assertion -- which means it is acceptable to mainstream Jews. How can it be a blood libel to expose it in a play?<br />
<br />
3) As for the ‘I wouldn’t care if we wiped them out’ bit, of course this is not a majoritarian position among Jews, but the important consideration here is whether it is mainstream enough to have a Jewish parent in a play (among several ones, not all of them holding the same positions) express it. And it looks like yes. In the recent Israeli attacks on Gaza, Jews from all over Israel flocked to the place to watch the bombing of the strip live. This has attracted attention from several news corporations. The Danish television did a report on it:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Tjw8U0AcH4Q&hl=es&fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Tjw8U0AcH4Q&hl=es&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
Actually, Churchill's play is an understatement. It's not that the Jews in this video wouldn't care if the Palestinians were wiped out. They're clearly enjoying it, helping themselves to coffee from a machine especially brought for the occasion, as if they were on a picnic. One of the Jews, identified as Keren Levy, actually hopes for the city of Gaza to be taken off the ground.<br />
<br />
Similar reports have been published by <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123136613816062175.html#articleTabs_video">The Wall Street Journal</a> and by <a href="http://mondoweiss.net/2012/11/israeli-watching-bombing-of-gaza-from-southern-israel-arabs-are-less-than-dogs-kill-them-all.html">Mondoweiss</a>, among others. In the Mondoweiss post, again we see Jews enjoying the destruction of the city:<br />
<br />
<a class="u-url profile" href="https://twitter.com/scottroth76"><span class="full-name">
<span class="p-name customisable-highlight">Scott Roth</span>
</span>
<span class="p-nickname" dir="ltr">@<b>scottroth76</b></span>
</a>
<br />
<div class="e-entry-content">
<div class="e-entry-title">
2 assholes drinking beer and smoking cigarettes while they watch Gaza get bombed. Fun times! <a class="link media customisable" data-pre-embedded="true" dir="ltr" href="http://t.co/GYCCC1nz">pic.twitter.com/GYCCC1nz</a></div>
<div class="dateline">
<a class="u-url customisable-highlight long-permalink" data-datetime="2012-11-15T13:48:28+0000" href="https://twitter.com/scottroth76/statuses/269074389243400192">
<time class="dt-updated" datetime="2012-11-15T13:48:28+0000" pubdate="" title="Time posted: 15 Nov 2012, 13:48:28 (UTC)">1:48 PM - 15 Nov 12</time>
</a>
</div>
<div class="cards-base cards-multimedia">
<div class="media">
<a href="http://twitter.com/scottroth76/status/269074389243400192/photo/1" target="_blank">
<img alt="View image on Twitter" data-src-2x="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A7vxuz2CEAEjVEH.jpg:large" height="375" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A7vxuz2CEAEjVEH.jpg" title="View image on Twitter" width="281" /> </a></div>
<div class="media">
</div>
<div class="media">
<br />
Now of course this is not majoritarian behavior in Israel, but certain attitudes are so shocking that the mere fact that they are publicly and proudly displayed points to societal tolerance therof. When both neutral media, leftwing sites and rightwing, pro-Zionist newspapers all report on different instances of a practice, it means that it is not marginal -- or at least not enough not to be mentioned as part of the possible reactions of an Israeli parent.</div>
<br />
So that I fail to see where exactly the blood libel lies. Churchill describes phenomena that exist and are widely reported, while a libel is basically a false statement about someone. Getting angry at her, rather than at the Jews who adopt such regrettable positions and behaviors, is clearly an instance of shooting the messenger.</div>
</div>
Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-39152941637615210422012-09-05T19:43:00.001-07:002012-09-05T19:52:23.065-07:00Policy... and facts on the groundFrom the Jerusalem Post's <a href="http://www.jpost.com/LandedPages/talkbackpolicy.aspx">talkback policy</a>:
<br />
<blockquote>
Talkback Policy
Our aim is to provide the worldwide readership of The Jerusalem Post with a platform for lively but good-tempered debate. <b>We do not tolerate abusive language, and such talkbacks will be rejected.</b><br />
<br />
- Priority is given to talkbacks that are brief and topical<br />
<br />
- The Jerusalem Post reserves the right to limit the number of comments published<br />
<br />
- Use of capital lettering in headlines and comment text will usually result in rejection by our moderating team<br />
<br />
<b>- Comments posted by registered users will be posted automatically, as long as they do not contain racist or libelous content or incitement to violence</b><br />
<br />
- Guest comments are posted only after approval by our moderating team<br />
<br />
- Talkbacks may be edited and shortened<br />
<br />
To report service abuse, simply flag the comment in question.</blockquote>
(Emphasis mine.)
What should we make, then, of the following <a href="http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=283447#">comment</a>?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTvu0pKf9Ys3zdj7-UZKo4hGIMQk2qs3Kpb5cjPLCRgSiFJYiAmlxavsKfI-Ngg4BvIejZq_Ph5BORs0mnUYO3n0z-nBBxJee5wNLJ8EYn377chcx8idAJNg-z5-7yi2TVkRe7i6ZRY4w/s1600/Racism.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTvu0pKf9Ys3zdj7-UZKo4hGIMQk2qs3Kpb5cjPLCRgSiFJYiAmlxavsKfI-Ngg4BvIejZq_Ph5BORs0mnUYO3n0z-nBBxJee5wNLJ8EYn377chcx8idAJNg-z5-7yi2TVkRe7i6ZRY4w/s400/Racism.jpg" width="393" /></a></div>
<br />
My opinion is that we shouldn't make much. Despite its declared policy, I don't think the Jerusalem Post should police all comments published on its talkback. Widespread censorship ends up harming minoritarian views much more than majoritarian ones.<br />
<br />
The fact, however, that such a blatantly racist comment has stood for 4 days without being flagged, and that it was praised by 19 people (against just 4 who opposed it), speaks volumes about the Jerusalem Post's readership, whose opinions, as far as I know, are fairly mainstream by Zionist standards.<br />
<br />
But that is not the point I'm trying to make. The point I'm trying to make is that whenever comments containing setereotypes about the Jews are published in, say, The Guardian, Zionists declare the news outlet to be antisemitic for failing to purge the offensive text. The same behavior is not expected from papers that publish much cruder stereotypes about the Arabs or Muslims. This is part, of course, of an ongoing double standard, whereby the Jews are more entitled to protection against hate speech than non-Jews. Which is tantamount to bigotry against many people, not least among them the Jews themselves.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-19647578561794232362012-07-09T22:15:00.001-07:002012-07-09T22:15:10.863-07:00"But Israel punishes its haters"Arab and Muslim leaders often say and do outrageous things that affect the Jews and Israel. Conversely, Jewish leaders often say and do outrageous things that affect the Palestinians, both the ones holding Israeli citizenship and those living in the Occupied Territories.<br />
<br />
The standard Hasbara answer to the latter uncomfortable reality is that Jewish haters are punished by the state of Israel. Every time a rabbi spews his racist venom or an Israeli soldier beats a prisoner with a camera somehow managing to record the incident, the Hasbara troupe points to the fact that the affair is being investigated and, if found guilty, the perpetrators will be jailed. This is very reassuring of Israel's commitment to law and order -- in stark contrast with its Arab neighbors.<br />
<br />
Or is it. An interesting experiment is to keep track of the "investigations" that are started, and see whether they ever result in a conviction. A Ynet story from two days ago would suggest otherwise. Under the headline <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4252803,00.html">Incitement case against Safed rabbi dropped</a>, the story describes the acquittal of rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu, who was reported some time ago to have made overtly racist remarks against Arabs. These <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4151639,00.html">included</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"Arab culture is very cruel."<br />
<br />
"Arabs have a different codes and norms that have become ideology. Such as the agricultural thefts, which have become part of Arab ideology."<br />
<br />
"Their behavior is unpleasant. An elderly Arab lady who recently moved into our Amidar neighborhood has already become a nuisance. Every Shabbat 10 cars filled with Arabs visit her. They play music, make noise."<br />
<br />
"Arabs treat their women according to social norms that are supported by the Quran which allow them to hit women – and with them these are not mild blows. These are blows with chairs –abuse that ends with the woman being admitted to the hospital."<br />
<br />
"A Jew should not run away from an Arab. A Jew should chase away Arabs."<br />
<br />
"Expelling Arabs from Jewish neighborhood is part of the strategy."</blockquote><br />
An "investigation" was started by Israel's attorney-general Yehuda Weinstein. At the time, the rabbi's supporters did not deny these statements -- nor did the rabbi himself, who instead <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4154328,00.html">moaned</a>: "Journalists have freedom of press. Am I the only one subject to the law?" The investigation took into account that that in 2006 Rabbi Eliyahu struck a plea bargain with the State to avoid trial on incitement to racism charges over anti-Arab remarks he had made. The rabbi agreed to retract the statements attributed to him in the indictment and apologize to those who may have been hurt by them.<br />
<br />
Fast forward to two days ago, and the AG has finally found Eliyahu not guilty. It suddenly turns out that the evidence is insufficient:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Weinstein decided to throw out the case at the request of the State Prosecutor's Office after investigators found no evidence that the quotes "correctly reflected the statements that were actually made."<br />
<br />
Among other leads, the investigators probed the journalists who quoted Eliyahu; none had recorded his speech. According to the statement, some reporters admitted that they could have tweaked the content.<br />
<br />
The prosecution therefore could not rule out the possibility of a discrepancy that could have occurred between Eliyahu's actual remarks and they way they were quoted.</blockquote><br />
The story also points out that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>The comments were purportedly said in support of an edict issued by Eliyahu and 50 other rabbis, warning followers against renting or selling homes to anyone who isn't Jewish.</blockquote><br />
Surely this is also cause for starting an investigation? Not so, according to the Attorney-General, who had dismissed that possibility from the beginning:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>As for the halachic ruling, AG Weinstein said he decided not to launch a criminal investigation because it would be difficult to prove that the ruling was issued with the intent to incite, as required by law. Weinstein also mentioned that <b>the rabbis would benefit from the protection the law provides in cases involving the use of quotes from the scriptures</b>. The AG said that in general he tries to avoid criminal proceedings when it comes to halachic rulings unless they sanction physical violence on the basis of race.</blockquote><br />
I.e., Israeli law protects hate as long as it's Torah-based and it doesn't involve physical violence.<br />
<br />
As I read that I recalled an incident that took place in 2008. An Israeli soldier, St.-Sgt. Leonardo Correa, had shot a bound and blindfolded prisoner in the foot with a rubber-coated bullet, with his commander, Lt.-Col. Omri Burberg, holding the prisoner's arm and looking on. The incident was videotaped by a Palestinian girl:<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2JMIEYE__G0?fs=1" width="459"></iframe><br />
<br />
It occurred to me to find out whatever had happened to that soldier and officer. An investigation did get started. After failing a polygraph test, the commander <a href="http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=109631">admitted</a> he had ordered the soldier to fire. The soldier also <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3625255,00.html">admitted</a> to receiving the order and heeding it. Buried in his story, however, were these two striking paragraphs:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>At the time of the shooting L. did not know it was being documented by a B'Tselem video camera. "<b>There was an inquiry in the brigade.</b> I explained the misunderstanding that occurred, the things I misunderstood, my mistake and it ended with that. <b>Two weeks past <i>(sic)</i> and nothing happened</b>, I thought I may go to jail, but no one said anything," he said.<br />
<br />
<b>After the video appeared in the media, the IDF quickly demanded an explanation</b> from the regiment commander.</blockquote><br />
I.e., although the incident had been looked into within the brigade, it was only after the crime was exposed by the media that a public investigation was started, which makes one wonder how many similar events may go unreported, simply because there was no camera to film them.<br />
<br />
To make a long story short, the investigation ended in January 2011. A Tel Aviv military court <a href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=205471">decided</a> not only not to jail Burberg, but also not even to demote him. Some of the arguments were pretty ridiculous:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>The soldier, St.-Sgt. Leonardo Correa, claimed that Burberg had ordered him to fire, but the officer told investigators that all he had told the soldier to do was “shake his gun” to scare the detainee who was lightly injured in the foot.</blockquote><br />
How you can scare a blindfolded person by shaking a gun goes beyond my comprehension.<br />
<br />
Sgt. Correa, who heeded a clearly illegal order, wasn't thrown into jail either. Instead, he was demoted to the degree of corporal.<br />
<br />
So that yes, Israel does investigate its haters. But punish them? Give me a break.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-48903718171675356432012-02-11T12:16:00.000-08:002012-02-12T07:07:56.627-08:00Dershowitz strikes back -- with lies (yawn)So there was this <a href="http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?id=257107&R=R5">BDS conference</a> held at Pennsylvania University -- one of the Ivy League institutions. Myself, I'm a fence-sitter with regard to Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions -- I don't boycott Israeli products as such (although if I knew that they were made in the occupied territories, I would), while I think that divesting from Israeli companies makes sense only in certain specific cases. I'm more comfortable with the idea of sanctions.<br />
<br />
In any case, this BDS event was organized at UPenn and, as might be expected, lots of Israel <s>firsters</s>supporters rallied to organize counterevents that brought much larger attendances. This is not surprising since BDS is taking its first infant steps in the realm of mainstream discourse.<br />
<br />
One of the anti-BDS events was a speech by the ineffable Alan Dershowitz. Under the headline <a href="http://www.standwithus.com/app/inews/view_n.asp?ID=2155">Dershowitz strikes back</a>, the StandWithUs site provides a raving review of the Dersh's presentation which, as can be predicted, consists basically of a regurgitation of tired Hasbara points. Of a somewhat higher interest is the Q&A, and in particular this exchange with a student:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>During the question-and-answer session after the Annenberg presentation, one female student asked, "If an Arab student comes up to me and says, 'You took my land,' and I respond, 'Yeah, but we support gay rights,' how does that add up?"<br />
<br />
Dershowitz said the answer is that the Jews didn't steal the land.<br />
<br />
"The land on which Israel was established had a Jewish majority," he said. "In Israel's case, they bought the land, in this case from distant land owners, who lived in Syria and Lebanon. The Israeli policy of the yishuv was never to throw indigenous Arabs off the land.<br />
<br />
"Israel's birth certificate is cleaner than the birth certificate of almost any other modern country in the world," he added. "Israel was established by law."</blockquote><br />
Notice Dershowitz's goal-shifting. In his last paragraph he seems to suggest that because Israel is cleaner than "almost any other modern country in the world," an Arab has no right to complain that his land was stolen. It's, of course, the case of the tax evader who claims he can't be jailed because other, worse criminals are free.<br />
<br />
But to his credit, he does provide an answer to the student's question: the land was not stolen; the Jews bought it from "distant landowners" in Syria and Lebanon.<br />
<br />
There's no denying that the Jews bought land in Mandate Palestine. But <i>the</i> land? Israel consists of some 22,000 sq km of land. By 1946, a year before the UN partition resolution, land ownership was distributed as follows:<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><img border="0" height="1158" src="http://www.palestineremembered.com/Maps/New/Map5_OwnerShip.gif" width="692" /></div><br />
This map was first published in the excellent Palestinian advocacy site <a href="http://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Maps/Story573.html">PalestineRemembered.com</a>, which in turn obtained the information from <a href="http://domino.un.org/maps/m0094.jpg">this</a> United Nations document from the time.<br />
<br />
As can be seen, the Jews didn't enjoy majoritarian ownership in any district. Quite on the contrary, in most districts of present-day Israel the land was overwhelmingly owned by private Arab citizens, with the Jews coming close (but still lagging behind) only in Haifa and Jaffa. This can be more startingly underlined by seeing a map of the land that the Jews did own:<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><img border="0" src="http://www.palestineremembered.com/Maps/New/JewishOwnedLandInPalestineAsOf1947.gif" /></div><br />
Thus, <i>the</i> land was not bought from distant landowners. In fact, only about 1,500 sq km (some 6% of present-day Israel) was bought by the Jews. See <a href="http://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Articles/Story1000.html">here</a> for the scanned relevant page of the British report "Survey of Palestine" published prior to the partition plan.<br />
<br />
What happened, then, with the Arab-owned land? After some 700,000 Arabs were expelled or fled the 1948 war, their property was confiscated by the 1950 <a href="http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/E0B719E95E3B494885256F9A005AB90A">Absentee Property Law</a>, whereby the real estate of those "absent" owners was transfered to a State Custodian, who in turn leased it to the Jews. Here are a few relevant paragraphs from this law:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>2. (a) The Minister of Finance shall appoint, by order published in Reshumot, a Custodianship Council for Absentees' Property, and shall designate one of its members to be the chairman of the Council. The chairman of the Council shall be called the Custodian. <br />
<br />
3. (b) <b>The Custodian may appoint agents for the management of held property on his behalf</b> and may fix and pay their remuneration. <br />
<br />
4. (a) Subject to the provisions of this Law -<br />
(1) all absentees' property is hereby vested in the Custodian as from the day of publication of his appointment or the day on which it became absentees' property, whichever is the later date;<br />
(2), <b>every right an absentee had in any property shall pass automatically to the Custodian at the time of the vesting of the property; and the status of the Custodian shall be the same as was that of the owner of the property.</b></blockquote><br />
The emphasized (by me) sentences can't be described in any other way than the Custodian stealing the Arab owners' land.<br />
<br />
So that no, Mr. Dershowitz, the Jews didn't buy <i>the</i> land but <i>some</i> land which constituted a very small proportion of present-day Israel; and yes, what the Jews did with Arab-owned property is tantamount to barefaced thievery. And by the way, you've just been exposed once again as a straight-faced liar.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com12tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-88167666022526006422012-02-09T19:13:00.000-08:002012-02-10T04:20:02.999-08:00"Iran threatened Israel": the umpteenth iteration of a lieOn the website of United With Israel, one of many pseudo-NGO's devoted to scare Jews into donating money for Zionist causes (such as the improvement of the editors' standard of living), there is currently a post titled <a href="http://unitedwithisrael.org/iran-must-attack-israel/">Iran: We Must Attack Israel by 2014</a>. Wow, I said to myself, they were right and I was wrong, and Iran has actually pledged to exterminate the Jewish state. The post, however, is a verbatim transcription of a Jerusalem Post story titled <a href="http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/News/Article.aspx?id=257112">'Iran must attack Israel by 2014'</a> (quotation marks included in the original), so that here we have a first problem. It's not the same Iran (i.e. its government) claiming that it must attack Israel as some unnamed source stating as much. By slightly changing the headline's punctuation, UWI already managed to distort the story it was quoting.<br />
<br />
But what was the story? In the first paragraphs, the JPost informs us that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's strategist provided the legal and religious justification for the annihilation of Israel and the Jewish people, in a document published on conservative Farsi website Alef. Reports of the document began to circulate the internet this week.<br />
<br />
The document, written by strategy specialist Alireza Forghani, outlined the reasons why, "In the name of Allah, Iran must attack Israel by 2014." </blockquote><br />
So that this article is, in principle, written by "Khamenei's strategist" -- were you aware the Grand Ayatollah had one? Me neither. All of a sudden, however, this Forghani fellow pops up. The only internet mentions he gets are for this article of his, but we must believe he is <i>the</i> "strategy specialist" who advises the Islamic Republic's Supreme Leader.<br />
<br />
So that looking for more information on this frightening character I turned to the source of all wisdom. No, not God, MEMRI. The über-Zionist outfit reports on the story in what purports to be a scholarly analysis, with footnotes and all. The title is <a href="http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6058.htm">In Response to Escalating Threats between West and Iran, Iranian Official Calls On Regime To Attack Israel</a>. An official? Let's read a few paragraphs:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>As the reciprocal war of words between the Western and Iranian media escalated, and in response to Israeli declarations regarding the necessity of stopping Iran's nuclear program with a military strike, Alireza Forghani, a staunch supporter of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei<a href="http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6058.htm#_edn1" name="_ednref1" title="">[1]</a> and, until recently, governor of Kish Province, called on the Iranian regime to attack and annihilate Israel. His article, titled "Iran Must Attack Israel by 2014" and published February 4, 2012 on numerous pro-regime websites,<a href="http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6058.htm#_edn2" name="_ednref2" title="">[2]</a> follows an article he published a month ago praising jihad against the Americans and emphasizing the Iranians' hope for a war in which they would die as martyrs.<a href="http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6058.htm#_edn3" name="_ednref3" title="">[3]</a><br />
Forghani's latest article contains two parts. The first expounds on the religious justifications, based on the Koran and the teachings of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, obligating all Muslims to attack Israel for stealing Palestinian lands and aspiring to take over the rest of the Islamic lands between the Nile and the Euphrates. According to the author, such an attack is obligatory, whether as defensive jihad (when Muslims are attacked by others) or as jihad in its basic sense (holy war against infidels).<a href="http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6058.htm#_edn4" name="_ednref4" title="">[4]</a></blockquote><br />
Notice that Forghani's article is a "response to Israeli declarations regarding the necessity of stopping Iran's nuclear program with a military strike." I.e., there does exist a concrete Israeli threat, and it's only in response to that threat that Forghani proposes a preemptive attack.<br />
<br />
The following endotes provide evidence for MEMRI's claims:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><div id="edn1"><a href="http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6058.htm#_ednref1" name="_edn1" title="">[1]</a> Forghani referred to Khamenei as "Imam" as early as September 2011. <a href="http://alireza-forghani.blogfa.com/">http://alireza-forghani.blogfa.com</a>, September 3, 2011. He recently resigned his post as governor of southern Iran's Kish Province over tensions with pro-Ahmadinejad circles. Fars (Iran), December 24, 2011.</div><div id="edn2"><a href="http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6058.htm#_ednref2" name="_edn2" title="">[2]</a> The article, which originally appeared on Forghani's February 4 blog in both Persian and English, was published on websites aligned with Iran's moderate-conservative stream and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), such as Fars, Mashreq News, Jahan News, Alef, and Asr-e Emrooz.</div><a href="http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6058.htm#_ednref3" name="_edn3" title="">[3]</a> See MEMRI Special Dispatch No.4467, "Iranian Websites Publish Threats against U.S. Targets in Gulf," February 1, 2012, <a href="http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6047.htm">http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6047.htm</a>.</blockquote><br />
Notice that Forghani keeps a blog, where his article was originally published (i.e. it's not an original material from any Iranian State agency). Notice also that all the evidence for Forghani being a staunch supporter of the Ayatollah is that he referred to Khamenei as "Imam." That being said, something must be wrong with MEMRI's sources. For one thing, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provinces_of_Iran">there's no Kish province</a> in Iran. There does exist a Kish island, but for another thing, the only governor of that territory mentioned over the Internet is Madjid Shayesteh, who was incumbent <a href="http://www.jpost.com/LandedPages/PrintArticle.aspx?id=57002">at least until September 2011</a>. But in any event, if Forghani resigned in December, he's an ex-official, not an official as MEMRI's headline claims.<br />
<br />
Or is he? Ynet's <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4185497,00.html">coverage</a> of the story claims he's a computer engineer, which would be more logical for a 28-year-old (MEMRI reports that he was born on August 31, 1983) than being an ex-governor of something.<br />
<br />
Although MEMRI says that the article was published in both Farsi and English, it never gives us a link to the English version. Instead, it cherry-picks various paragraphs and presents them under scary headlines, but it's not clear if these are Forghani's or MEMRI's. Although the Zionist organization tries to induce us into thinking that Forghani wants to annihilate the Jews, there's no reference in the article to any Jews than Israel's. <br />
<br />
Deep buried in the story (but, to MEMRI's credit, not omitted) is the following paragraph:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>It would seem that the article, whose publication coincided with statements by Khamenei, in his Friday speech of February 3, about the need to wipe out the "cancerous growth" of Israel, is the regime's response to recent statements by Israeli leaders regarding the necessity of attacking Iran. While Forghani, who notes that his article expresses his own views and not necessarily those of the regime, states that Iran must take it upon itself to annihilate Israel, Khamenei has avoided pitting Iran as an active combatant against Israel, keeping his country in a supportive role of assisting other forces against Israel.</blockquote><br />
In this, and only in this, MEMRI seems to concur with the other sources. The JPost reports that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Claiming to only represent the personal opinion of its author, and not the Iranian government, the doctrine was published on a website believed to have close ties with the Ayatollah.</blockquote><br />
Ynet, for its part, informs its readers that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Forghani, who describes himself as an enthusiastic supporter of the Iranian government and a former member of the Revolutionary Guard's Basij militia, stressed that the opinions presented in his post are his own and do not represent the regime's position.</blockquote><br />
Notwithstanding which, the Daily Mail <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2097252/Kill-Jews-annihilate-Israel-Irans-supreme-leader-lays-legal-religious-justification-attack.html#ixzz1lwb8Slaq">reported</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>'Kill all Jews and annihilate Israel!' Iran's Ayatollah lays out legal and religious justification for attack</blockquote><br />
So that an article that called to attack Israel in a preemptive strike in response to an existing Israeli threat, and which was written by a young man who may be a strategy advisor to Iran's supreme leader or the ex governor of an ill-defined polity, but most probably a computer engineer, and which, moreover, explicitly claimed to reflect the writer's opinions only, is suddenly transformed into a hateful call to kill all Jews made by none other than Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.<br />
<br />
That's how Zionist myths are manufactured, and how they gain circulation. By providing endless bits of slightly false information, Zionist sites and news outlets manage to transform an irrelevant event in the blogosphere into one more reason why Iran should be nuked.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-57057918282626474962012-02-04T21:46:00.000-08:002012-02-04T21:57:54.874-08:00The caveat. Always look for the caveatIt is well known that the Israeli Supreme Court banned torture in 1999. It is far less well known that it didn't. Now how can this be? How can something be forbidden and allowed at the same time?<br />
<br />
The answer is that all Israeli landmark decisions that apparently uphold Palestinian rights come with a caveat that renders them irrelevant. In the case of the torture ruling, it allowed recourse to the necessity defense and <a href="http://74.125.95.104/search?q=cache:sdo95aOJCL8J:poli.haifa.ac.il/%7Emgross/torture%2520polity.htm+%22Nevertheless,+the+court+did+not+ban+torture+absolutely%22&hl=es&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=ar+">permitted</a> investigators to use torture to meet immediate and otherwise unavoidable grievous threats to innocent life. And guess what: since then, every time Israel wants to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/03/israeli-doctors-report-torture-palestinian">torture</a> someone it labels him or her "a grievous threat to innocent life," <i>et voilà</i>, business as usual.<br />
<br />
I was reminded of this only the other day, when a Ynet story under the title <br />
<a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4184623,00.html">Gov't to withhold aid from settlements</a> caught my eye. The auspicious lede read "Ministers decide to exclude 70 West Bank settlements from national priorities map; The story was covered up, officials say." By then I was sure that this decision had a clause that would allow the settlements to apply for prioritarian treatment anyway. The only doubt was how it would be worded. But why had that decision been made in the first place? The article first gave us the context:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>The government has decided to exclude 70 West Bank settlements from the list of national priority areas, Ynet has learned Thursday.<br />
<br />
The list asserts which towns across the country are to receive grants and benefits aimed at boosting the communities' economy and making them more attractive for new residents and investors. <br />
<br />
On Sunday, the government voted to approve an updated version of the list, which included the 70 settlements. A day later, it was proposed to remove towns that are located beyond the Green Line from the priority map; the initiative was put up to a telephone vote, and was passed by a 15-10 margin. Several ministers abstained from the vote.</blockquote><br />
Then came the reason for the decision:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Government sources estimate that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was concerned that including the settlements in the list will hurt the latest efforts to restart the peace talks with the Palestinians. Due to this fear, the West Bank communities were deemed ineligible for automatic aid.</blockquote><br />
How "concerned" of Mr. Netanyahu. He has enough conscience to understand that the settlements will be a hindrance in the peace process, but not enough not to build them.<br />
<br />
By then, however, I had grown a little impatient. I didn't have to wait much, though, since the following paragraph gave me what I was looking for:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>The settlements can still apply for incentives, but the decision to grant them these benefits is left up to the government.</blockquote><br />
So what do you think will happen in the next few months? What are you saying? That most, if not all, of the 70 settlements will apply for incentives? And that in most, if not all, of those cases the government will decide to grant them? Are you kidding me? Are you suggesting Israel acts in bad faith? But yes, you got it right and that's what will in all likelihood happen.<br />
<br />
So that next time a Zionist brings up a suspiciously democratic Israeli decision or piece of legislation, don't think too much and confront your hypothetical pro-Israel friend with one simple phrase: it's the caveat, stupid.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-61533942171447084532012-01-31T20:16:00.000-08:002012-01-31T20:33:04.671-08:00B'nai B'rith to Argentina: censor things we don't likeThe following comic strip was <a href="http://www.larazon.com.ar/actualidad/Polemica-historieta-antisemita-publicada-Pagina12_0_315600131.html">published</a> by the Argentinian daily Página/12:<br />
<br />
<div class="fbContentPanel_black" id="fbContentPanel" style="opacity: 1; visibility: visible;"><img class="fbItem_black" height="250" id="fbItem" src="http://www.lapoliticaonline.com/data/img_cont/img_imagenes/img_gr/12532.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; left: 20px; top: 20px;" width="720" /></div><br />
Even if you have no Spanish, you'll identify the figure of Adolf Hitler in it, and you'll realize it purports to depict a concentration camp.<br />
<br />
If you do have Spanish you'll agree that it isn't funny at all (partial translation in the blockquote that follows), and it plays on the suffering of concentration camp inmates, which expectedly will anger and offend Holocaust survivors.<br />
<br />
Now is it antisemitic? Here's <a href="http://bnaibrith.org/latest_news/ArgentineCartoon012012.cfm">what the B'nai B'rith had to say</a> about it:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><b>B'nai B'rith Strongly Condemns Anti-Semitic Cartoon in Argentine Paper: Comic Strip Portrays Dance Party at Concentration Camp, Hitler Appearance</b><br />
<br />
B’nai B’rith International condemns in the strongest terms possible an anti-Semitic cartoon strip, “FieSSta,” (the capitalized “SS” referring to the Nazis) by Gustavo Sala published in the Argentine paper Página 12 and calls on the country’s government to denounce the daily newspaper under the country’s anti-discrimination law.<br />
<br />
The cartoon strip’s main character, DJ David Gueto (a caricature of the French DJ David Ghetta) plays music in a concentration camp. At first, the prisoners don’t want to dance because they feel there’s nothing to celebrate, saying: “do you know that they kill us in gas chambers and make soap with us?” Hitler then appears and convinces them to dance because “life is short.” Hitler then thanks the DJ, saying: “If they are relaxed, the soap will be better.”<br />
<br />
B’nai B’rith expresses its deep outrage and revulsion toward this cartoon, its creator and the newspaper that chose to publish it.(...)<br />
<br />
“This cartoon strip is beyond offensive—it is frightening. It epitomizes the blatant, ongoing anti-Semitism that still exists, in 2012, throughout the world,” said B’nai B’rith International Executive Vice President Daniel S. Mariaschin.</blockquote><br />
Now I would say there's a very objectionable point about this comic strip: it repeats the canard that the Nazis made soap from their victims. This is an insult to German rationality, since making soap from corpses made no sense and would have been a waste of resources. While many Jews have disseminated the canard, historians (Jewish or not) have discarded it. Other than that, the strip correctly claims that the inmates were exterminated and that gas chambers were used to that effect. So where's the antisemitism? Is the Holocaust denied? Are the Jews stereotyped? No and no. Are the Jews ridiculed?<br />
<br />
One might say yes, but actually we don't know who the prisoners are. They are not shown with a Star of David stitched to their shirts. The B'nai B'rith is indulging in a racism of its own by taking it for granted that the inmates in the strip are Jewish, thus forgetting that Gypsies and Soviet prisoners were also sent to the gas chambers. But let's suppose that the strip's author had Jews in mind. Yes it is offensive. Yes it is making fun of victims of genocide. But no stereotypes are used, and that is the smoking gun absent which talk of antisemitism is unreasonable.<br />
<br />
Not content with calling antisemitism what really isn't, the B'nai B'rith proceeds to give its advice to the Argentinian government:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>“We hope the Argentine government swiftly and strongly utilizes its anti-discrimination law to take the appropriate route to quell this and any further anti-Semitic behavior,” said B’nai B’rith International President Allan J. Jacobs.</blockquote><br />
There does exist an <a href="http://www.redconfluir.org.ar/juridico/leyes/l23592.htm">anti-discrimination law</a> in Argentina, but it doesn't cover this case. Let's see the relevant articles:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><u>Article 1</u>: Any person who arbitrarily prevents, obstructs, restricts or in any way diminishes the full exercise on an egalitarian basis of the fundamental rights and guaranties recognized in the Constitution will be obliged, at the damaged person’s request, to suspend the effects of the discriminatory action or stop performing it, and to repair the moral and material damage caused. To the effect of the present article discriminatory actions or omissions determined by such motives as race, religion, nationality, ideology, political or trade-unional opinion, gender, economic position, social condition or physical characteristics will be particularly considered.<br />
<br />
<u>Article 3</u>: A prison term of 1 month to 3 years will be imposed on those who participate in an organization or disseminate propaganda based on ideas or theories of superiority of a race or group of people of a certain religion, ethnic origin or color, which are aimed at justifying or promoting racial or religious discrimination in any form. The same punishment will be meted on those who by any means encourage or incite to persecution or hate against a person of group of people because of their race, religion, nationality or political ideas.</blockquote><br />
Clearly, neither article says anything about callously mocking someone else's suffering, even if a specific group is singled out for ridicule.<br />
<br />
So that the B'nai B'rith is not actually demanding for the law to be enforced; it's asking for censorship (disguised as anti-discrimination) to be used against things that they (or I, for that matter) don't like. The government, naturally, won't take the advice, and the myth of an antisemitic Argentina (Argentina, where the foreign minister is Jewish) will make the rounds of the Jewish press once again, maybe persuading 10 or 12 young Jews to emigrate to Israel. Which is very convenient for the cause of Zionism, even if absoloutely inconvenient for the causes of truth and intellectual honesty.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-53625280249147552512012-01-30T14:53:00.000-08:002012-01-31T13:29:56.650-08:00The thin-walled Israeli Jewish glass houseAn article's title can convey either its subject or its thesis. Thus, the title of Shaul Rosenfeld's recent Ynet story "<a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4181223,00.html">Israel's shameful Arabs</a>" can be inerpreted as meaning "this article will deal only with those Israeli Arabs who are shameful" or "the thesis of this article is that Israeli Arabs are shameful." Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that the former is meant (although you and I know that a story titled "<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/40535904">The US's exploitative Jews</a>" would not enjoy the same benefit of the doubt).<br />
<br />
The article targets Israeli Arab lawmakers, whom Rosenfeld finds to act, well, shamefully. Ahmad Tibi, a member of Knesset best-known for having coined the catchphrase "Israeli is democratic and Jewish: democratic for the Jews, and Jewish for the Arabs," is slammed in the first place for having stated:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>The shahid is honored throughout the history of nations. He is the one who blazed the trail for us. No value is more noble than martyrdom... Israelis are ignorant with regards to the term 'shahid' and misunderstand it. It refers to anyone who was killed by the occupation for the homeland or died for a national cause.</blockquote><br />
The shahid is a martyr, and it is well-known that all countries have martyrs whom they venerate. Since Tibi makes no mention of any particular martyr, we don't know if he's including terrorists among their numbers. "A national cause" may include killing civilians, but since he doesn't explicitly say so, he enjoys plausible deniability, which is all that counts in the eyes of Zionists.<br />
<br />
I have a hard time understanding why Rosenfeld finds this outrageous. Israel honors the terrorist David Raziel, who masterminded the murder of scores of innocent Arabs with bombs in markets. As his admirer Meir Kahane <a href="http://whateva.host.sk/tmp/kahane-uqfcj.txt">described</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">On July 6, 1938, time bombs were put in milk cans and placed in the Arab market place in Haifa by an Irgun member dressed as an Arab porter. In the explosion that followed, 21 Arabs were killed and 52 wounded.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Two days later, the Irgun threw a bomb into a crowd of Arabs waiting near the bus terminal near Jaffa Gate; three were killed and 19 injured. A week later, on a Friday, as Arabs left their mosque at the foot of David Street in the Old City, an electronically detonated mine went off killing 10 Arabs and wounding 30.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">On July 25, 1938, a 30-kilogram explosive went off in the Arab marketplace in Haifa. Hidden in a barrel of sour pickles, it killed at least 35 Arabs and wounded 70 more. The Arabs were terrified; the Jews were hysterical. Raziel was content.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">One month later, the Irgun switched to Jaffa, a nest of the worst gangs of Arab vipers in the country. An Irgun member, once again dressed as an Arab porter, placed a bomb in the Arab Dir-a-Salach marketplace. The official version listed 21 Arabs dead and 35 wounded. In reality many more went to Islamic heaven.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">February 27, 1939, proved to be yet another "Black Day" for the Arabs as the Irgun, sensing the impending collapse of Arab terror in the face of Jewish vengeance, attacked three cities. In Haifa, two powerful explosions went off, one at the ticket window of the railroad station in East Haifa and the other at the Arab marketplace. At least 27 Arabs were killed. Half an hour later, in Jerusalem, three Arabs were killed and six wounded in an</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Irgun explosion on David Street, while another died after being attacked on an Arab bus passing Mahane Yehuda.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Finally, in Tel Aviv attacks on Arabs near the power station in the north and in the Salama district in the south killed three more.</span></blockquote><br />
But Raziel has been thoroughly rejected by Zionists, hasn't he? Er no; let's read on:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">David Raziel was a terrorist, a murderer who went against everything that was "Jewish." Today, one may visit a settlement due west of Jerusalem named Ramat Raziel and live on Raziel Street in East Talpiot in Jerusalem. One may hear talks on the glory of Raziel and see mementos of him at the Herut headquarters on King George Street in Tel Aviv and may look up paeans of praise of him from the speeches of Yitzhak Shamir, Menachem Begin and Moshe Arens.</span></blockquote><br />
So that Tibi honors the shahids, but we don't know exactly what people he's talking about. On the other hand, the Jews of Israel honor Raziel, whom we know to have been a monstrous Jewish terrorist who killed countless civilians. What's the problem?<br />
<br />
Rosenfeld goes on to bash Hanin Zoabi, another Israeli Arab MK, along with other unnamed ones. He claims:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">These Arab MKs also board various Gaza-bound ships or visit Hamas leaders or enlightened Arab rulers such as Gaddafi, may he rest in peace.</span></blockquote><br />
This is in line with the article's lede, which states "Arab parliamentarians endorse tyrants, terrorists while slamming 'undemocratic' Israel."<br />
<br />
One has the right to slam an undemocratic country, even as one visits undemocratic leaders. It's called freedom of conscience. But if you think one doesn't enjoy that right, then you must be consistent. You must never have made friends with dictators.<br />
<br />
And here's where file photos come in handy. <br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div id="main-content-picture"><img alt="South Africa's prime minister John Vorster (second from right) is feted by Israel's prime minister Yitzhak Rabin (right) and Menachem Begin (left) and Moshe Dayan during his 1976 visit to Jerusalem. Photograph: Sa'ar Ya'acov" height="192" src="http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/red/blue_pics/2006/02/07/knesset1.jpg" width="372" /> <br />
<div class="caption" style="text-align: left;"><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">South Africa's prime minister John Vorster (second from right) is feted by Israel's prime minister Yitzhak Rabin (right) and Menachem Begin (left) and Moshe Dayan during his 1976 visit to Jerusalem. Photograph: Sa'ar Ya'acov</span></i></div></div><br />
Yes, you got it right. Israel invited South African dictator John Vorster in the heyday of Apartheid. <br />
<br />
Rosenfeld would have been better advised to take a legalistic approach, such as "visiting Lybia was illegal." But since he tries to slam Arab lawmakers citing moral considerations, his attempt fails miserably, because he's throwing rocks from a glass house, and a very thin-walled one at that.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-32520706712141450252012-01-29T08:07:00.000-08:002012-01-29T10:56:03.470-08:00Walls and antisemitismWhen you're slandered, it sometimes takes a time before you get vindicated. This is so because astute slanderers usually make claims that can't be checked, and not many people have enough logical training to understand that the burden of proof falls on the one making an assertion.<br />
<br />
A few years ago, those of us who opposed the Israeli Apartheid wall, or, if you want to be Orwellian, security fence were slandered as antisemites. The centerpiece of the argument was that many countries were building or had completed border fences, so why single out Israel? The fact that Israel's wall, and only Israel's, was slammed and denounced, had obviously everything to do with antisemites being unable to stomach assertive Jews who defended themselves rather than submissively accepting to be killed. For instance, an <a href="http://www.jewishmag.com/94mag/presbyterian/presbyterian.htm">article</a> in the Jewish Magazine analyzing the Presbyterian Church's divestement from Israel (which included a disgusting image of a cross partially hiding a swastika) claimed:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>The Presbyterians say they have a problem with the Israelis building a security fence to protect themselves from attack. There is a long list of countries that built a security barrier between their own country and an enemy. [Long list follows.] The church is notably quiet about the construction of barriers in these countries. Is it because there is a double standard when an issue concerns Jews?</blockquote><br />
The smoking gun was the fact that rights organizations took the case to the UN, which referred it to the International Court of Justice, which in turn found the wall to be illegal. This had never been done before and meant that not only pundits and NGO's, but the whole world was antisemitic, further proving the need for Israel to exist and, <i>en passant</i>, grab ever more Palestinian land. When the UN acted on the ICJ's advisory opinion, a neocon site <a href="http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2005/01/anti-semitic-un-moves-against-israel.html">declared</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">ANTI-SEMITIC UN MOVES AGAINST ISRAEL SECURITY FENCE<br />
<br />
Hat-tip to the inimitable </span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://www.wabcradio.com/showdj.asp?DJID=12009">MARK LEVIN</a></span><span style="font-size: x-small;">: <br />
</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=13014&Cr=palestin&Cr1=">The UN is setting up a bureaucracy to assist Arabs in the occupied territories of Israel to make claims against the Government of Israel</a></span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> for losses they assert were caused by the anti-terror security fence . (See other news stories </span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-01/12/content_2447790.htm">HERE</a></span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> and </span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/525937.html">HERE</a></span><span style="font-size: x-small;">.) <br />
<br />
Levin - tonight, on his syndicated radioshow - made the point that there are DOZENS of other security fences on disputed territories which have NEVER EVER been the subject of ANY UN attack.</span></div></blockquote><br />
We anti-Zio... sorry, antisemites, were quick to point out a small, a minimal, an insignificant difference between those "dozens of other fences" and Israel's: in the Israeli case, the wall/fence was built outside of its internationally recognized borders, so that it cut off populations inside the West Bank from each other and from the agricultural lands they tended to. One town, Qalqiliya, was completely surrounded by the fence, in an ironical reversal of the mediaeval practice of surrounding a city with a wall to defend it.<br />
<br />
The Zionists ignored this difference and kept claiming that we were incurable antisemites. They said that we singled out Israel and we pointed out that Israel singled itself out by building a wall different from everyone else's: who was right? Of course, we were proving our claim, but Zionists didn't even when they had the obligation to. But as noted about, the public is not usually aware of the "burden of proof" rule.<br />
<br />
So it would be great if we could convince the logically challenged. And how could we do it? Well, easy: if Israel changed its behavior and built a separatory barrier <i>along</i> its recognized borders (rather than <i>beyond</i> them), and we refrained from taking the case to the UN, it would mean we're not antisemites at all. We would be holding Israel to the same standards we use for other countries with similar barriers. If this were the case, the allegation of antisemitism (on this issue, at least) would be dead and buried.<br />
<br />
Wait a minute, it's <a href="http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Article.aspx?id=196221">already happening</a>. Israel is building a barrier along its Sinai border with Egypt. This fence's primary objective is to stop illegal migrants from getting into Israel. We antisemites masquerading as anti-Zionists should be up in arms against this fence, which foils one of our favorite plans: to flood Israel with non-Jews so that it will lose its Jewish identity, in a silent Holocaust. We should be asking for the ICJ to declare the fence illegal.<br />
<br />
But since the fence is being built on Israel's side of the border, as it should, we're doing nothing of the like. Not that we like it, mind you; I, personally, hate all such barriers and am pleased that my country has erected none. But I won't take the case of this particular wall to the ICJ--because I'm not antisemitic; and if anyone did, the ICJ would not find it illegal, because it's also not antisemitic.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-2796554258519370572012-01-29T04:56:00.000-08:002012-01-29T04:56:49.026-08:00On keeping a blog like thisOver the last few months I've been discouraged to continue to keep this blog. The reason is simple. This is a blog devoted to expose bad-faith defenses of Israel. The problem is that such defenses have a sort of lack of genetic variety, or, to put it in a simpler way, they are always the same. The argument, for instance, that Gaza doesn't suffer from the Israeli blockade just because candy bars are allowed in or a roller coaster exists in the strip can be easily defeated, as I have, by pointing out that even in the Warsaw ghetto the Nazis allowed Jews such luxuries as a symphony orchestra, or paper to print posters. This doesn't deter the hasbarists, however, and they keep citing the same argument over and over. <br />
<br />
The same goes for the endless denunciations of Iranian president Mahmood Ahmadinejad's nonexistent threat to wipe out Israel. Even as the regime has repeatedly declared that Israel will collapse on its own, and that there's no need for Iran to intervene, the canard is tenaciously repeated. <br />
<br />
Similar to all propaganda efforts, hasbara is not about making convincing cases based on sound logic, but about using any means available to defend Israel. This includes lies and false analogy, and if such devices are exposed it doesn't matter, because a lie becomes a perceived truth if it is repeated often enough.<br />
<br />
I recently discovered, however, that one of my posts had forced a correction by CAMERA, the rabidly Zionist propaganda organization (more about this in an upcoming post). So that maybe keeping the blog does make a difference after all, and I've decided to start posting again.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-5035874205522239732011-05-03T17:11:00.000-07:002011-05-04T10:34:14.510-07:00Polls that matter and polls that don't matterOK, so the United States has killed Osama Bin Laden and thrown his body into the sea. A highly symbolic development that gives Barack Obama some much-needed oxygen. For the record, I fully reject the killing of civilians and am totally against Osama's methods and activities. However, I believe he wasn't nearly as important now as he used to be; killing him wasn't my top priority. I also believe that disposing of his body the way the US did was childish and unwarranted; and that the cause of anti-terrorism would have been better served if he had sat before a tribunal to face charges of crimes against humanity. That being said, having him convicted by a court of law wasn't my top priority either.<br />
<br />
But the Zionists are taking advantage of his death to <a href="http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2011/05/palestinian-arabs-are-al-qaedas-most.html">remind us</a> that Palestinian Muslims were the most ardent supporters of Osama. This is the inculpatory evidence:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5GHhi8UXn0dzER-oE9WkoqGlfHBsgVpB7hWgQq5xawqz9J1kMUS3eGb02tIdOaHvVNM7ep18PVtF4obB0sSrsFLsfyb4yYll1mbWXOkX5nw3MC_TsWkOOM1DVTD_jI7T0AOcUKtx638g/s1600/2011-osama-021.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="342" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5GHhi8UXn0dzER-oE9WkoqGlfHBsgVpB7hWgQq5xawqz9J1kMUS3eGb02tIdOaHvVNM7ep18PVtF4obB0sSrsFLsfyb4yYll1mbWXOkX5nw3MC_TsWkOOM1DVTD_jI7T0AOcUKtx638g/s400/2011-osama-021.png" width="400" /></a></div><br />
These figures would indeed be worrying if they had any relevance at all. When Palestinians are asked about Al Qaeda or Osama Bin Laden, words are, to a large extent, being put in their mouths. It's not like they are spontaneously demonstrating in favor of Al Qaeda. Osama is, was, a reality far removed from theirs, almost a construct. Saying that they had confidence in him is irrelevant insofar as most Palestinians, an overwhelming majority, had no chance of translating that declared confidence into a concrete support for Bin Laden. Even more importantly, those who did have that possibility --the Palestinians who managed to travel and settle abroad-- did not enroll in Al Qaeda. Indeed, Stanford's Martha Crenshaw, one of the foremost scholars in terrorism studies, has <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=ehR5GCp10-0C&pg=PA72&lpg=PA72&dq=%22palestinians+in+al+qaeda%22&source=bl&ots=M09TspO6e_&sig=gZmxawbdauSJYN8t4ei5hJKKtJA&hl=es&ei=hY7ATfZOiMOBB6nt2OEF&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CGkQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=%22palestinians%20in%20al%20qaeda%22&f=false">noted</a> that there are "almost no Palestinians in al Qaeda and no proven links with Hamas or the other Palestinian groups that use terrorism against Israel." So when the Palestinians are asked if they have confidence in Bin Laden, their answer must be seen as a manifesto against the West that has so often betrayed them. Essentially they are telling the Western pollster "I'll say what I know that will irk you." If they meant it, they would have joined Al Qaeda in large numbers.<br />
<br />
Now this must be compared with other polls about concrete matters and events the respondents can take an active part in. Case in point, the <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3998010,00.html">one</a> published by Ynet on 15 Dec 2010, after more than 50 top Jewish religious figures signed on to an anti-Arab racist letter:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><div style="color: #990000;"><b>Poll: 55% back rabbis' anti-Arab ruling</b></div><br />
Survey shows 41% of secular Israelis support municipal religious leaders' call not to rent apartments to non-Jews, as do 64% and 88% of Israel's traditional and haredi Jews, respectively.</blockquote><br />
This kind of support is not speculative or theoretical or pure blah-blah. Many of the respondents are Jews who do own apartments and who, in 55% of the cases, would not rent them out to Arab tenants. And they don't stop there; they're also taking positive steps to <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4003502,00.html">oust</a> Arabs from apartments owned by other Jews. But it gets worse. Shortly after the ruling, racist Jews <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/8178129/Holocaust-survivor-threatened-for-renting-rooms-to-Arabs.html">threatened</a> a Holocaust survivor <i>--a Holocaust survivor!--</i> with the burning of his house if he didn't stop renting rooms to Arab students. For all the Yom Hashoah (Holocaust Day) commemorations, with the sirens sounding, the cars stopping in the roads and the deeply moving 2-minute silence, the crude fact is that Jews in Israel hate Arabs more than they love Holocaust survivors.<br />
<br />
In short, the polls showing an apparently outrageous Palestinian support for Osama are basically meaningless and reflect an exercise in <i>épater le bourgeois</i>, since Palestinians are not rushing to join Al Qaeda. The polls showing a deep Jewish racism against Arabs, on the other hand, reflect a hate that is translated into very real actions of arson, threats and attacks against both Arabs and non-prejudiced Jews. And that matters much more than mere words.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com14tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-57320052505657403102011-04-27T18:52:00.000-07:002011-04-27T19:00:12.066-07:00Jewish racist of the dayAlthough there is no shortage of nominees, today's award goes to Rabbi Dov Lior, head of the Kiryat Arba yeshiva. Sorry, Daniel Pipes; your efforts are commendable, but the Rav is trying harder and has clearly outdone you.<br />
<br />
The distinguished sage <span class="text14">chose to use the platform of the fourth Ramla conference to <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4060912,00.html">state</a> that the State of Israel "must encourage Bedouins to return to their native land." In case you believe, correctly, that the native land of Israeli Bedouins is, well, Israel, be advised that Lior has a different theory which posits that they were born in Libya and Saudi Arabia. Where he gets that from is unclear, but a good bet is that someone recently presented him with a copy of Joan Peter's <i>From time immemorial</i>. It would be interesting to know Lior's theory of how these non-Jews managed to immigrate to Israel, where, individual cases aside, only Jews are allowed to become citizens. I guess it must have something to do with Arab deceptiveness.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="text14">In support of his proposal, Lior stressed that </span><span class="text14">"If they are left here, there won't be any solution as they work against the people of Israel and the State of Israel." It is a particularly well known fact that Bedouins, together with the Druze, serve in the IDF, which is not the case with yeshiva students such as, ehm, Lior's. Facts? What's that? It's narratives that count, dude.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="text14">Lior is a chemically pure hater. His résumé includes a variety of jewels, among which:</span><br />
<br />
<ul><li><span class="text14">In 2008 he <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3521246,00.html">pioneered</a> the restrictions-on-Arabs wave by calling on Jews not to employ them.</span></li>
<li><span class="text14">In 2010 he <a href="http://maxblumenthal.com/2010/08/how-to-kill-goyim-and-influence-people-leading-israeli-rabbis-defend-manual-for-for-killing-non-jews/">endorsed and foreworded</a> Yitzchak Shapira's <i>The complete guide to killing gentiles</i>. (Well, the tract's title is actually <i>The King's Torah</i>, but it does remove most restrictions on killing non-Jews, including newborns: </span>“There is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults.”)</li>
<li>Also in 2010, he <a href="http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2010/12/more-than-3-dozen-top-rabbis-sign-ruling-forbidding-renting-or-selling-homes-to-arab-israelis-345.html">signed on</a> to the rabbinical letter forbidding Jews from renting houses to Arabs.</li>
<li>In 2011, he <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4006385,00.html">ruled</a> that <span dir="right"><span class="text16g" dir="ltr">Jewish Law prohibits sterile couples from conceiving using non-Jew's sperm, as it causes adverse traits. With a logic that would dwarf Aristotle, this Jewish genius wondered: "If the father in not Jewish, what character traits could he have? Traits of cruelty, of barbarism! These are not traits that characterize the people of Israel."</span></span></li>
</ul><br />
<span dir="right"><span class="text16g" dir="ltr">When US journalist Helen Thomas claimed that Israeli Jews should return to where they came from, all hell broke lose and she was fired. When a relevant Israeli rabbi who is (literally speaking) right at the center of Jewish-Arab land disputes says the same about Bedouins the story is met with deafening silence from the world press. I'm not outraged at this unequal treatment. It signals that in one case the hateful statement is extraordinary, abnormal, anomalous, while in the other case it's an everyday occurrence that hardly raises eyebrows anymore.</span></span><br />
<span dir="right"><span class="text16g" dir="ltr"> </span></span><br />
<span dir="right"><span class="text16g" dir="ltr">In any event, Rabbi Lior is a valuable asset for those of us who spend time exposing officially-supported (Lior is a State employee) hate of Arabs in Israel. That's why I'm giving him the Jewish Racist of The Day Award.</span></span>Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-72038062845349831202011-04-25T09:35:00.000-07:002011-04-27T19:44:55.140-07:00Israel tastes own medicine, cries antisemitismOn Sunday, several crazed Jewish settlers <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4060222,00.html">invaded</a> Palestinian Area A territory (where, in theory at least, Palestinian Authority exercises full control) to pray at the so-called Joseph's tomb in Nablus, without previously getting the required authorization. It appears that PA policemen tried to stop them. The Jews refused to give themselves up and apparently broke through a checkpoint. Warning shots were fired, and they still refused to stop. In an unclear turn of the events, the settlers were then shot at, with the result that Ben Yosef Livnat (the nephew of Minister of Culture and Sport Limor Livnat) was killed and the four others were injured.<br />
<br />
For what it's worth, I'm against the police shooting trespassers unless it's patently clear that they intend to hurt the officers; I believe this was an avoidable tragedy. That said, one would expect the Israeli authorities to be very happy with this outcome, since it perfectly fits into Israeli engagement rules. They should have noted that:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>The settlers were criminals seeking for trouble and they got it.</li>
<li>This is war, and war is messy.</li>
<li>The Palestinian policemen have the right to prioritize their own lives over those of the civilians they regrettably kill.</li>
<li>The settlers made suspicious movements.</li>
<li>The policemen had to make difficult decisions in a short instant of time, decisions you and I don't face.</li>
</ul><br />
Instead, the Israeli government displayed the crudest Jewish victimhood. Minister Livnat said: <br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">I woke up this morning and received a phone call from Ben-Yosef's mother, who told me that <b>he was murdered by a terrorist masked as a Palestinian police officer</b>. <br />
<br />
It was cold-blooded murder. Ben-Yosef went to pray with other Jews, and <b>he was murdered simply for being a Jew</b>.</blockquote><br />
Prime Minister Netanyahu <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4060264,00.html">concurred</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned on Sunday evening the shooting incident at Joseph's Tomb in Nablus that killed 24-year-old Ben-Yosef Livnat and injured two other Hasidim, <b>calling it a "terrorist attack."</b><br />
<br />
In his statement, Netanyahu urged the Palestinian Authority "to take harsh steps against the perpetrators who committed this <b>heinous act against Jewish worshipers who were on their way to prayer</b>." </blockquote><br />
Defense Minister Barak <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4060182,00.html">was also furious</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Barak's office said: "<b>No coordination mishap justifies this kind of outcome or the shooting of innocent people.</b>" Barak ordered the IDF to investigate, as well as demanded "the PA take swift and full measures against the shooters." </blockquote><br />
I for one am unimpressed by these gentlemen's (and lady's) outrage. Of course, if Livnat hadn't been a fanatical Jew he wouldn't have been there in the first place, so that his death is, in a way, related to his Jewishness. But the reason he was shot is not that he was a Jew; it's that he broke the law, and while you can get away with it most of the time if you're a West Bank settler, there are times when your luck runs out and you get shot.<br />
<br />
It's interesting to compare the killing of this Jew with <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/idf-kills-65-year-old-palestinian-man-during-raid-on-hamas-cell-in-hebron-1.335713">that of an elderly Palestinian citizen</a> earlier this year:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">A Palestinian resident of the southern West Bank city of Hebron was killed early Friday during an Israel Defense Forces raid on the city to arrest Hamas members, security and medical sources said.<br />
<br />
The IDF raided Hebron to re-arrest six Hamas members that the Palestinian Authority had released only the day before following an intervention from the emir of Qatar.<br />
<br />
Medical sources said <b>a 65-year-old Palestinian, who was reported to be an unarmed civilian, was brought dead to hospital with several bullet wounds to the upper part of his body.</b> They said the man had been shot in a building the soldiers had raided to arrest one of the Hamas members.<br />
<br />
<b>The man who was killed, Amr Qawasme, was asleep when soldiers broke into his home before dawn.</b> His wife, Sobheye, said IDF troops brushed past her into the bedroom, where she heard several shots fired. When she went in, she found her husband in a pool of blood. </blockquote><br />
There are several differences between both killings:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>The settlers were engaging in illegal activities. The Palestinian old man was asleep.</li>
<li>The PA responded to a conflict initiated by the settlers. The IDF started a conflict by invading the Palestinian's house.</li>
<li>The PA policemen were taken by surprise. The IDF action had been carefully planned.</li>
</ul><br />
Despite this, PM Netanyahu didn't find the "misshap" that ended in Qawasme's death outrageous at all. It was just a product of the messiness of war.<br />
<br />
The fact that Israeli authorities are not even mentioning the illegality of the shot settler's actions is very telling, considering that even the victim's relatives blame him for his lunacy:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b>The 17-year-old brother</b> of one of the wounded men arrived at Rabin Medical Center in Petah Tikva, where they have been hospitalized.<br />
<br />
"<b>They knew what they were getting into, and the level of risk involved. But they considered it as action</b>," the brother told Ynet.<br />
<br />
"They only wanted to pray; sometimes fate can be pretty bad and unpleasant," he said, adding "they have a rabbi that coordinates these entries. This time they came without a permit or authorization of the rabbi.<br />
<br />
"When the visits are coordinated nothing happens – the rabbi looks after us. However this time the rabbi wasn’t there with them; <b>it was a crime for them to enter the tomb without the rabbi or a permit</b>," noted the brother. </blockquote><br />
But it's always easier to cry antisemitism than to reflect on how your crazy policies are encouraging young people to consider themselves above the law -- and meet their death as a consequence.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-13466800071586784642011-04-23T13:58:00.000-07:002011-04-23T13:58:57.459-07:00Yes, but what about Tibet!This week saw the resolution of the Itamar murders case, in which five members of a family, including three children, were apparently killed in cold blood by two Palestinians from the village of Awarta. It must be noted that, according to the <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4057894,00.html">IDF account</a>, the two acted on their own. The organization they belonged to, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, didn't authorize the attack, and, although it doesn't seem to have done anything to stop it (much like the Israelis at the time of the Sabra and Shattila massacre), they didn't provide the murderers with the weapons they had asked for. It is true that several PFLP members seem to have given shelter and cover to both murderers after the attack, but they seem to have done so as their relatives, not as members of the organization.<br />
<br />
In any event, Israeli Jews were quick to blame the whole Palestinian people. Reflected the father of the illegal settler slain:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>This is a heinous murder of bottomless hate that is simply impossible to understand. Going into a family home and murdering people is something that only those who have it instilled in them from babyhood can do.</blockquote><br />
A Ynet reader noted in a comment:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><b>84. What kind of society spawns teens who slit a baby's throat?</b> <br />
<br />
There is a very deep problem here. Palestinians had better stop wallowing in the blame game, and start addressing it.<br />
Serge, Montreal, Canada (04.18.11)</blockquote><br />
Zionist like to make Tibet analogies. You know, Israel may occupy Palestinian land, although Israel disputes this, but what about the Chinese occupation of Tibet? So that it occurred to me to compare the Palestinians' reaction to Israeli occupation to the Tibetans' reaction to Chinese annexation. <br />
<br />
First a little context. Tibetans are full Chinese citizens and enjoy exactly the same rights (or lack thereof) as their ethnic Han fellow citizens. They face no checkpoints. They can drive on the same roads as the Han. China has built extensive infrastructure for them, including the highest railroad in the world, against zero investment in infrastructure for the occupied Palestinians on the Israelis' part. The Tibetans' "suffering" is nowhere like the Palestinian subjugation at Israeli hands.<br />
<br />
When Tibetans rioted in Lhasa in 2008, however, they behaved with "bottomless hate." They caused extensive damage to property:<br />
<br />
<img alt="Chinese picture of damage caused by protestors in Tibet" height="200" src="http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00659/news-graphics-2008-_659412a.jpg" width="300" /><br />
<br />
Five girls were burnt alive in a store:<br />
<br />
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Y_e0kOBo4Vc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
<br />
All in all, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/crackdown-as-10-burnt-to-death-in-tibet-riots/2008/03/15/1205472170804.html">10 people</a> were burnt alive during the protests. The rioters made it a policy to target Han people and businesses, so that ethnic Tibetans had to attach white prayer shawls to their houses and stores for them not to be set on fire.<br />
<br />
So what kind of people can stab a baby to death? I guess the same kind of people who can burn a shop assistant alive. It's called human beings. The Palestinian reaction is very much like that of any other people under similar conditions of oppression and humiliation.<br />
<br />
To summarize, if Israel's behavior must be compared to China's, the Palestinians' response must be compared to the Tibetans' -- which Zionists never do, in a clear example of double standards.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com249tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-55161500383649165442011-04-09T12:22:00.000-07:002011-04-10T07:36:19.759-07:00The Jews do do these thingsOn 11 March 2011, an adult couple and three of their children were stabbed to death at the Israeli settlement of Itamar. It is yet unclear who murdered them, and I was waiting for the investigation to reach a conclusion before commenting on the case. Almost one month has passed, though, and a gag order remains in place forbidding Israeli officials from releasing information on the investigation's progress. However, today, April 9, is a good day to reflect a little on this tragedy and how it has been handled.<br />
<br />
One of the most striking aspects about the coverage of the massacre was how the Zionist media were quick to ascribe it to terrorists, despite the alternative explanations available (revenge killing by a Thai worker, retribution for the killing of 2 Palestinian children near the settlement two years ago...). Not only that, but the whole Palestinian people were dehumanized in op-ed after op-ed, despite the Palestinian Authority's condemnation of the murders. In some cases the demonization reached cosmic levels. I was particularly shocked by a Hanoch Daum article at Ynet under the title <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4041942,00.html">These are not humans</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Are they members of the family of nations at all? Would a human being stab a three-month-old baby girl in her sleep and kill a tender four-year-old child sleeping peacefully in his bed next to his parents’ bedroom? (...)<br />
<br />
We can keep talking at length about painful concessions, but as long as on the other side we have blood-thirsty psychopaths capable of knifing an 11-year-old child, a four-year-old boy, and a baby who was just born, such talk would mostly be futile.<br />
<br />
We have to recognize the following fact: Inhumane elements exist in the other camp. These are terrorists that Israel must eliminate, before they kill our children.</blockquote><br />
The desired reader reaction took nothing to arise:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b>15. Kill of 5 family members</b><br />
The pain that is coused here is too unbearable. something must be done about it. my heart bleeds for this family- wich will have a heavy future. May god protect us from those Unhuman Living things wich act worse then animals.<br />
Katy, Vienna (03.14.11)<br />
<br />
<b>30. Time to kill Palestinians (End)</b><br />
Eyal, USA ISRAEL (03.14.11)<br />
<br />
<b>43. The Murderers are not Psychopaths</b><br />
Hanoch Daum is wrong. The murderer who perpetrated this horror is not a psychopath. He is not a sick individual. He is the natural product of his upbringing, an upbringing that glorifies the spilling of Jewish blood. A society that names public squares and schools after murderers is going to produce more of the same. When are we going to wake up this reality. Bibi and all the rest talk of bringing the perpetrator to justice. The entire society is to blame. The perpetrator is simply the agent who actually carried out the horror. The society applauds him and in a few years will name a school or a hospital after him.<br />
Moshe Tokayer, Petach Tikvah (03.14.11)</blockquote><br />
Now Ynet talkbacks are moderated. One wonders what the reaction would be if, say, The Guardian published a comment along the lines of "Time to kill Jews."<br />
<br />
But what I take issue with most is Hanoch Daum's assertion that "the other" side is capable of horrific actions that, presumably, his side would never engage in. Yes, the old, tired argument "They hate, we don't; the Jews don't do these things." <br />
<br />
Even if we accept, for the sake of argument, that the settler family was murdered by a Palestinian, it is utterly wrong to compare what that presumed terrorist did with what the State of Israel does and conclude that only one side, the Palestinians, intentionally kills civilians. Three thoughts arise:<br />
<br />
1) The Palestinians can’t disguise their crimes as military actions. The Israelis can. We can’t say “the Israelis don’t kill civilians;” at most, we can say that the extent of IDF operations makes it impossible to ascertain if the civilians that they kill are intended murders or not. The recent case of an old man killed in his sleep by IDF forces provides an excellent example of a totally unnecessary and highly suspicious death in which the soldier who pulled the trigger is acquitted based on his own testimony.<br />
<br />
2) The Israelis have at their disposal –and use– a variety of methods to punish the Palestinians, from bombing their power plants to targetedly killing their leaders (and a few bystanders in the process) to impeding the import of food and clothing. The only way the Palestinians have of exacting a price for the Israelis’ crimes is to randomly kill civilians. Again, this is not to excuse those killings; it’s simply to compare the many retaliatory options the Israelis enjoy with the only one the Palestinians have. Give them planes, choppers and the most powerful army in the Middle East and they will probably do other, less disgusting things, such as blacking out Tel Aviv, killing 120 policemen at a graduation ceremony or using Israeli minors as human shields.<br />
<br />
3) If any valid comparison is to be established, it must be with what the Jews did when they didn’t have a State. And here's where it is worth remembering that in such a day as today, April 9, but 63 years ago, Jewish terrorists under the command of later Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin carried out the <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/deir-yassin-massacre-55-years-on-1.13393">Deir Yassin massacre</a>, in which at least 93 Arabs were murdered in cold blood -- <i>before</i> Israel became independent, the seven Arab armies invaded, etc.<br />
<br />
And it doesn't end there. When the Jews didn’t have a State, they randomly killed civilians — <a href="http://lawrenceofcyberia.blogs.com/news/2005/12/the_other_road__1.html">42 machine-gun attacks on buses, trucks and carts</a> in January-March, 1948, alone; Arab women, children and elderly people <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Irgun_attacks#cite_note-15">blown to smithereens in markets</a>; high-ranking UN officials <a href="http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2008/09/18/p28759">mowed down in the street</a>… And remember, the most ferocious Jewish terrorist of all, David Raziel, has hundreds of streets and even a town named after him. <br />
<br />
Indeed there may exist a peaceful people that fully rejects the killing of civilians, but it’s not the Jews.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-80368472933385324092011-04-01T07:24:00.000-07:002011-04-03T11:15:01.497-07:00Cum libelWhen you think of an Arab you picture a dark-skinned man with a piece of cloth around his head, shining black eyes and a knife hidden somewhere he might stab you with if you get too close. This man is unredeemably machoist, irrational, Jew-hating and gay-bashing. That's anyway the image created by decades and decades of Hollywood films such as Exodus, or of journalistic ranting by the likes of Daniel Pipes, Ann Coulter or Melanie Phillips.<br />
<br />
This Arab man is also, by the account of these specialists, a child rapist who specializes in sodomizing young boys. That's why when recently an Israeli Jewish boy aged 11 <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4049458,00.html">accused four Arabs of repeatedly raping him</a>, there could be no doubt that the four were guilty. They were immediately arrested, as the charges looked impressive:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Four Palestinians residing in Israel illegally have been arrested for allegedly raping and severely abusing an 11-year-old boy from central Israel several times. The four, aged 23-27, are also suspected of indecent acts.<br />
<br />
The Tel Aviv Magistrates Court extended their remand by four days on Tuesday.<br />
<br />
Police launched an investigation after the boy told his older brother he had been abused. The brother first became suspicious after the boy complained of stomach aches.<br />
<br />
He eventually revealed his terrible secret: "They paid me NIS 400 to sleep with them, bought me presents I asked, and threatened me not to say anything, I was ashamed to talk about it."<br />
<br />
The suspects were swiftly apprehended for fear they would flee to the territories.<br />
<br />
Police suspect that the four, who were working at an event hall, promised the boy candy, presents and money and lured him into accompanying them to the building where they lived.<br />
<br />
The four are also suspected of urinating on the victim, hitting him, putting out cigarettes on him, cutting him, and coercing him to use drugs.</blockquote><br />
Commenters on Ynet were quick to call the incident proof of the overall inhumanity of the Arab people:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b>6. Using sex for terror.</b><br />
There are no bounds to their savagery. This is sexual terrorism. They are doing the same to young women through out Israel. At what point do we say enough?<br />
Josh, US (03.29.11)<br />
<br />
<b>10. They have no respect for their own</b><br />
They do this to their own women. So this brutality is not surprising.<br />
Rachel, US (03.29.11)<br />
<br />
<b>24. Death Sentence for All Rapists!</b><br />
The sick perverts also kidnapped the little boy and G-D gave the death sentence for kidnapping. The child has been scarred for life by these inhuman filthy predators. These demonic monsters must never be released to perpetrate more evil. Please, G-D, help this little boy and his family.<br />
Linda Rivera, New York, USA (03.29.11)</blockquote><br />
To make a short story shorter, as it turned out <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4049847,00.html">the boy was lying</a>. On a second round of questioning, he changed his story, supplied a different description of his alleged rapists and finally admitted that the apparent signs of abuse on his rear were the result of an enema he had undergone.<br />
<br />
But just in case, the police had already <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4050289,00.html">beaten the four Arabs</a>, spat on them, shouted "death to the Arabs" and stolen their cell phones. Nothing new there; it's the usual prescription for a Palestinian prisoner in Israel.<br />
<br />
An interesting detail from this story is that these Arabs were Palestinians from the territories who were illegally working at an event venue inside Israel. How come the Apart... er, security fence did not stop these aliens from entering the country? And once they were inside, why did they look for a job, instead of committing a terror act to kill Jews, the ultimate objective of all Arabs? Maybe because they wanted to support their families rather than deny the Jews the right to self-determination? That can't be, they aren't that human.<br />
<br />
In any event, it is still true that they bestialize their camels and goats, isn't it? They haven't been able to prove that they don't, have they?Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-76818025444185019582011-03-29T20:27:00.000-07:002011-03-31T08:57:36.063-07:00Israel's opportunistic goodnessWhich is the country that, in the wake of earthquakes, tsunamis and other catastrophees, has made the biggest donations to the affected populations on a per capita basis? Yes, it's that particular and unique Middle Eastern country you're thinking of -- Saudi Arabia. To give but one example, after Pakistan was hit by devastating floods in 2010, Saudi committed public and private donations to the tune of <a href="http://www.infopak.gov.pk/Flood%20Relief%20Fund/17_9_2010ForeignAssistance_a.pdf">$350 M</a>; it also donated two 100-bed hospitals. This compares favorably with, for instance, the US's donation of $216.5 M (most of which loan guarantees, not an actual gift) or Britain's donation of $115 M.<br />
<br />
I bet that many readers of this post have never heard about this. The foreign aid given by Saudi Arabia is usually not reported by the media. On the other hand, the kingdom is harshly criticized over its treatment of women, non-Muslims and foreigners. Is there a double standard in place? Is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia subject to a policy of demonization, whereby its good actions go unreported, while its bad actions are widely discussed? Obviously this is not the case. Bad actions make for better headlines than good actions, and that's why the stealing of an old lady's $100 purse by two guys on a motorbike is news, while my neighbor's monthly cash donation of $100 to a soup kitchen is persistently ignored by the newscasts. That's also why the stoning of an adulterer gets more coverage than Saudi Arabia's gift of the King Faisal Hospital to Kigali, Rwanda. Anyone can understand this.<br />
<br />
Giulio Meotti also understands it -- in the case of Saudi Arabia. But he doesn't seem to understand it in the case of Israel. In a recent piece on Ynet under the title <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4049405,00.html">Ignoring Israel's goodness</a>, Meotti lists a few of Israel's responses to natural disasters, such as the earthquake in Haiti in early 2010, and complains that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Israel’s amazing altruism never had its legitimate space in the global media, because this radical goodness doesn’t fit in with the Zionist stereotype of the colonialist, fascist and apartheid occupier.</blockquote><br />
A reader picks up the Haitian example and claims:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The only reason the Israeli hospital in Haiti was covered was because it was the only one there - an oasis of salvation in a wasteland.</blockquote><br />
<span style="overflow: hidden; width: 375px;"><span style="overflow: hidden; width: 375px;">This is a good time to dispel this myth, and to put the claim of unfair reporting in perspective.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="overflow: hidden; width: 375px;"><span style="overflow: hidden; width: 375px;">The Israeli field hospital was not the only one in Haiti. An Argentinian field hospital was already operative before the Israelis arrived. Yet I don't see Argentinians moaning that the country's goodness is not reported. <br />
<br />
In fact, the Argentinian hospital was part of a permanent program for helping Haitians, which was in place before the earthquake and continues to be in place many months after. There's a huge difference between this genuine goodness and the bogus, opportunistic Israeli goodness, which only shows during the short time that TV cameras focus on a catastrophee site. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="overflow: hidden; width: 375px;"><span style="overflow: hidden; width: 375px;">If Israel's rescue actions are not seen as the definitive proof of Israeli generosity it's perhaps because the media can distinguish a PR operation, however sophisticated, from true charity, which is manifested over months and years </span></span><span style="overflow: hidden; width: 375px;"><span style="overflow: hidden; width: 375px;">of </span></span><span style="overflow: hidden; width: 375px;"><span style="overflow: hidden; width: 375px;">quietly helping those in need, rather than in spectacular, but short-lived, rescue efforts</span></span><span style="overflow: hidden; width: 375px;"><span style="overflow: hidden; width: 375px;"> </span></span><span class="text14"></span>whose foremost aim is to improve a country's image.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-60966786140287553212011-01-26T06:34:00.000-08:002011-01-26T06:40:41.849-08:00Great comments, #1Sometimes you read comments on blogs and online papers that you wish you had authored. I've decided to periodically report the most juicy ones, if only so that their authors will know that they haven't gone unnoticed.<br />
<br />
Let's start with a comment the other day on Haaretz. But first a little context. A few weeks ago the Palestinian Authority <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/idf-discharges-soldier-involved-in-hamas-raid-which-left-palestinian-civilian-dead-1.338010">freed</a> five Hamas terrorists, or suspected terrorists, that had been imprisoned several months before. Right after their release, Israeli soldiers invaded the Hebron building where they were staying, went into the wrong apartment and killed a 65-year-old man, Amr Qawasme, apparently in his sleep. After the regrettable mistake, they proceeded to go down to the floor below, where the men they sought were in fact staying, and captured them.<br />
<br />
The IDF published a report:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">According to the IDF, one of the soldiers in the mission fired on Qawasme "following a suspicious movement that caused the soldier to feel that his life was threatened."<br />
<br />
An investigation into the incident found that while this soldier fired "in accordance with IDF rules of engagement," a second soldier who followed the first one's lead and also began firing at Qawasme had acted "unprofessionally", and was thus discharged from his IDF service.</blockquote><br />
At least it can be said that the incident embarrassed a few Zionists before they could put their acts together. In the comments, the expectable knee-jerk reactions were immediately displayed:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b>65. What was the supposed "civilian" doing hosting a houseful of Hamas?</b><br />
<br />
* Jasper - Milwaukee<br />
* 20.01.11<br />
* 17:26<br />
<br />
Common sense would say there could be trouble.</blockquote><br />
This gentleman and others who subscribed to the same thesis apparently have some trouble making out the difference between a building and an apartment. The notion that the senior citizen was housing terrorists, however, immediately became a staple of the Zionist commentariat all over the blogosphere.<br />
<br />
Another, more reflexive type of comment was:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b>57. IDF discharges soldier involved in Hamas raid which left Palestinian civilian dead</b><br />
<br />
* Avi<br />
* 20.01.11<br />
* 12:42<br />
<br />
Why don't you all give it a rest. When the US kills 40+ civilians in Afghanistan I don't see you complaining</blockquote><br />
Now there's a problematic aspect to this argument in that it makes an analogy between two situations that can't be compared. Israel controls virtually all movement within the West Bank and has an extensive network of informers that allow it to gather intelligence as to where any person is located at any given time, which is hardly the case with the coalition forces in Afghanistan. Moreover, the situation in the WB is not one of war in the same sense that the situation in Afghanistan is. In 2010, more than 700 coalition troops, including 500 US ones, were killed in Afghanistan. By comparison, Israeli soldiers are only killed in accidents and friendly fire. The Hamas terrorists were not an imminent threat and the operation in which they were captured was not the "messy war" situation in which collateral damage arises. War, as conducted by Israel in the West Bank, is anything but messy. The Israelis had all the elements to perform a pinpoint, if entirely illegal, operation. If they didn't, it was not because of messiness, but because of carelessness and utter disrespect for any life not Jewish.<br />
<br />
Oh, yes, but I was going to quote a great comment. Here it is:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b>55. Hamas Just Completed Their Investigation of Suicide Bombers</b><br />
<br />
* Doug<br />
* 20.01.11<br />
* 11:36<br />
<br />
from 10 years ago. They have concluded that they only activated the bombs after there was suspicious movement by an Israeli, and that the bomber followed Hamas rules of engagement. However, one of the bombers acted unprofessionally and would have been dismissed had he not died in the bombing.</blockquote><br />
Cute, eh?Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-78728958420276038532011-01-13T06:23:00.000-08:002011-01-13T06:29:22.815-08:00Close encounters of a nasty kindIsrael provides free medical care to Palestinians. Every year, [fill in with number] Palestinians are treated in Israeli hospitals, getting world-class attention, which proves Israel is no cruel occupier.You will have heard this Zionist claim a fairly large number of times.<br />
<br />
For some reason, certain people seem to believe that you can't be bad unless you're absolutely bad. Unfortunately, they don't apply the same reasoning to the Palestinians, who are incurable Jew-haters even though they <a href="http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=198113">sent firefighters</a> to help control a recent fire in Israel, or to the Cuban leaders, who are irrationally evil even after they <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9311876/ns/us_news-katrina_the_long_road_back/">offered</a> to send some 1,600 medics, field hospitals and 83 tons of medical supplies to ease the humanitarian disaster caused by Hurricane Katrina in the US.<br />
<br />
But a recent <a href="http://www.jpost.com/Health/Article.aspx?id=203047">JPost story</a> provides a new angle to analyze Israel's kindness towards its occupied people (an obligation under international law, by the way) at its hospitals. Reports the daily:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b>Specialist helps Palestinian talk after 8 month silence</b><br />
<br />
The ability to speak – lost eight months ago by a 21- year-old Palestinian allegedly from the emotional trauma of an encounter with security forces – has been restored by a clinical communications specialist at Rehovot’s Kaplan Medical Center.<br />
<br />
The humanitarian gesture was that of Pnina Erenthal, who has much experience in treating psychogenic aphonia.(...)<br />
<br />
She finally found him and volunteered to treat his condition at Kaplan; approval for his entrance was granted by the authorities.(...)<br />
<br />
Erenthal said she “took the weak voice and helped him build it into sentences and texts. The first thing he said was about the trauma he had suffered,” but she did not provide details.(...)<br />
<br />
[The patient] said he was very excited by Erenthal’s initiative to restore his voice.<br />
<br />
“I want to study industrial engineering and management in university, and now I hope I will be accepted. Thanks so much to Pnina – she is a dear woman – and to Kaplan Medical Center which arranged all the authorizations.”</blockquote><br />
So here we've got a caring Israeli doctor who helps restore a Palestinian's lost speech. OK. But notice how matter-of-factly the article mentions the reason the young man suffered from that condition in the first place. He was traumatized by an "encounter" with Israel's security forces (<a href="http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/week-s-end/twilight-zone-lightning-strikes-again-1.335741">elsewhere</a> we learn he was beaten by police after he was caught in Ashkelon, where he works, without a permit to be in Israel).<br />
<br />
In the talkbacks, a reader moans:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b>3. This won't appear in Ha'aretz</b><br />
<br />
* Author: Michael<br />
* Country: Israel<br />
* 01/11/2011 08:16<br />
<br />
And you won't hear from Israel bashers like Ron in Fairfax, the Labrador Retriever, etc.</blockquote><br />
Leaving aside that it did appear in <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/week-s-end/twilight-zone-lightning-strikes-again-1.335741">Haaretz</a>, notice how oblivious the reader is to the fact that it was a (commendable) <i>private</i> citizen who took it upon herself to help out the young man, while it was the <i>public</i> forces of the State of Israel that traumatized him in an "encounter."<br />
<br />
At most we can say that Israel still has individual persons who have the will and the scientific knowledge to correct the wrongs caused by the State with its security bodies.<br />
<br />
Kudos to Dr. Pnina Erenthal for restoring a young Palestinian's speech. Shame on the Israeli police for beating him until they rendered him voiceless in the first place. Shame also on those who turn reality upside down by suggesting that it is a beautiful person's kindness what is representative of the State of Israel, and not the brutality daily exercised by its men in uniform.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-89419073162121561112011-01-02T12:15:00.000-08:002011-01-02T17:00:29.726-08:00An awful lot of few bad applesDavid Harris, the CEO of the American Jewish Congress, recently wrote a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-harris/how-can-you-defend-israel_b_801765.html">piece</a> for the Huffington Post in which he concluded that, with all its shortcomings, Israel is a liberal cause and, all in all, a good country. This should come as no surprise to anyone as Mr. Harris gets paid to find that Israel is a good country, but the most interesting part was the lively debate that ensued in the talkback. Some of us explained why Israel is not so good a country, giving numerous counterexamples. Basically, we argued that a country with the level of racism tolerated in Israel does not belong in the liberal democratic family. We were met with a lot of denial from the Zionist commentariat.<br />
<br />
<div></div>One problem with brainwashed Zionists is that they are programmed to deny everything, when a smarter approach would be to concede a few points before challenging their adversaries' theses. So that when you confront them with incontestable evidence, they always display the same kneejerk, instinctive reactions. Over the time it becomes tiresome. So here I'm presenting a few preemptive rebuttals to their also prepackaged talking points. (My blogging consists mostly of preparing materials ready for copy-pasting so that I won't have to spend so much time writing responses when confronting the Zios on the web.)<br />
<br />
<div></div><span style="font-size: large;">1) <em>It's a few bad apples.</em></span><br />
<br />
<div></div>This argument sometimes works for two reasons. First, people have short memories. After all, who among us could name the ethnic groups involved in the Rwandan genocide, and who killed who? (It was the Hutus killing the Tutsis.) When someone commits an act of racism in Israel, the reader of the story usually has already forgotten that last month, last week or the day before yesterday a similar act was carried out by other Israeli Jews. Second, there's a racist idea lingering in Western educated circles that the Jews are particularly moral or good, and if some behave bad they must necessarily be exceptions.<br />
<br />
<div></div>Looks like not, however. In the last few weeks, a stunning number of anti-Arab racist incidents took place in Israel, such as:<br />
<br />
<div></div><ul><li>On 17 Oct 2010, rabbi Ovadia Yosef, a senior Sephardic religious figure and leader of the Shas party, <a href="http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?id=191782">declared</a> that “Goyim (i.e. Gentiles) were born only to serve us (i.e. Jews). Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel.” </li>
<li>On 31 Oct 2010, a Jewish mob <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/two-jewish-youths-charged-with-shooting-at-arabs-during-safed-clashes-1.322147">gathered</a> outside of an Arab students' residence in Safed, chanted "death to the Arabs," hurled rocks and bottles at the building, shattering glass, and fired a shot at the building before dissassembling. If Jewish students had been thus treated elsewhere in the world, we would be talking of a Kristallnacht.</li>
<li>On 7 Dec 2010, a group of 50 state-paid rabbis signed a <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/dozens-of-top-israeli-rabbis-sign-ruling-to-forbid-rental-of-homes-to-arabs-1.329312">letter</a> instructing Orthodox Jews not to rent or sell houses to non-Jews. The letter was later endorsed by some 250 other Jewish religious figures. In a move reminiscent of darker places and times, a hotline was <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3998121,00.html">opened</a> for denouncing those Jews who did intend to rent out to Arabs.</li>
<li>On 12 Dec 2010, the rabbis of the Israeli Jewish city of Rosh Ha-Ayin, including the chief rabbi, <a href="http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2010/12/12/rabbi-orders-shop-owners-who-employ-jewish-girls-not-to-hire-arabs/">declared a ban on hiring Arabs</a> at stores which employ Jewish girls.</li>
<li>On 19 Dec 2010, a <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4001502,00.html">demonstration</a> was held in Bat Yam, close to Tel Aviv, against the "assimilation of young Jewish women with Arabs living in the city or in nearby Jaffa." One of the organizers, Bentzi Gufstein, declared that "the public is tired of so many Arabs going out with Jewish girls." One of the protestors <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4002085,00.html">called out</a>, "Any Jewish woman who goes with an Arab should be killed; any Jew who sells his home to an Arab should be killed."</li>
<li>On 20 Dec 2010, a group of five Arabs, including a Druze IDF veteran, were <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4003502,00.html">driven</a> from an apartment in Tel Aviv after their landlady was threatened with the torching of her house if she continued to rent out to Arabs.</li>
<li>On 21 Dec 2010, a gang of Jewish youths was <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4002406,00.html">arrested</a> in Jerusalem after carrying out a large number of attacks on Arabs. A girl aged 14 would lure Arab men to the Independence Park, where they were savagely attacked with stones and bottles and severely beaten. The teens confessed to nationalistic motives.</li>
<li>On 27 Dec 2010, the wives of 27 top rabbis signed another <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4005896,00.html">letter</a> calling on Jewish girls to stay away from Arab men. Echoing the "they want to take our girls" theme so common in supremacist societies, the document went: "there are quite a few Arab workers who use Hebrew names. (...) Don't date them, don't work where they work and don't perform National Service with them." </li>
</ul><br />
So that if indeed the perpetrators of such acts of hate can be described as a few bad apples, it's certainly an awful lot of few bad apples.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">2) <em>Like any other democracy, Israel has its problems.</em></span><br />
<br />
It is true that Israel has its problems and other democracies also have their problems, but it is wrong to convey the idea that both sets of problems are remotely comparable. As I commented on The Huffington Post:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Harris makes two comparisons. First, he compares Israel with other surrounding countries, and concludes that Israel is far better. No problem with that.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">But then he compares Israel to "every democratic, liberal and peace-seeking country" that he knows, and says that Israel is imperfect to the same extent that those other countries are. That is nonsense.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Take, for instance, Britain. In Britain you don't see 36 State-paid Anglican bishops signing a letter calling on Anglicans not to rent out apartments to Jews. You don't see an MP stating that intermarriage between Anglican women and Jewish men is dangerous for the women. You don't see the Housing Minister stating that the Jewish and Anglican populations should not mix. You don't see Anglicans hurling bottles and bricks at a building where Jewish students live while chanting "death to the Jews." </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">If anything remotely close to that were allowed in Britain, the country would be expelled from the EU and NATO and the US would sever ties with it. In Israel, on the other hand, such racism is allowed and encouraged by the government (please note that it's a Likud MK who's proposing a Knesset meeting to prevent intermarriage).</span></blockquote><br />
Israel has a problem of totalitarian supremacism entrenched in political parties that form part of the governing coalition. Nowhere else in the developed democratic world can anything similar be found.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">3) <em>It's not racism -- Judaism isn't a race.</em></span><br />
<br />
This argument takes advantage of the public's insufficient awareness of what the word "race" means, as we have explained <a href="http://thehasbarabuster.blogspot.com/2010/02/missing-word-in-dictionary.html">elsewhere</a>. But Israeli politicians are not afraid of calling it racism. As the Jerusalem Post <a href="http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=201426">reported</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Defense Minister Ehud Barak on Wednesday spoke out strongly against a letter signed by 27 rabbis' wives, which called on Jewish women not to date Arab men. He also had harsh words for a petition signed by municipal rabbis calling on Jews not to rent property to non-Jews.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Both letters, Barak said, are "part of a wave of racism, which threatens to carry Israeli society away to dark and dangerous places."</span></blockquote><br />
Anyone describing the latest events in Israel as anything less than racism is, thus, just one more instance of being <a href="http://thehasbarabuster.blogspot.com/2008/11/more-catholic-than-israeli-pope.html">more Catholic than the Israeli pope</a>.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">4) <em>The haters have been roundly condemned by the society, and they're already being sought by the police.</em></span><br />
<br />
If only.<br />
<br />
No one is saying Israeli Jews are not aware of the image problem created by the racism that pervades their society, and of the need to do something about it. It's called damage control. Thus we have the lame condemnations made by politicians and journalists, but which never end up in those who incite to hate being arrested. Actions speak louder than words, especially when it's state-paid rabbis who promote hate. At the very least, they could be dropped from the payroll. Yet, according to the <a href="http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=201449">Jerusalem Post</a>, "No legal or disciplinary action has been taken against the nearly 50 municipal rabbis who recently issued an edict against renting or selling real-estate to non-Jews in Israel." As The Guardian's Mya Guarnieri aptly put it when kicking ass on a <a href="http://cifwatch.com/2010/12/12/the-guardians-mya-guarnieri-and-junk-food-journalism/#comment-37606">rabidly Zionist site</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Again, as I said in the comments section of CIF, you seem to be confused between words and action. Everyone can condemn all they want but that doesn’t mean anything if the state doesn’t lift a finger.</span> </blockquote><br />
This, of course, may have to do with a large proportion of the constituency (a staggering <a href="http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=201256">44% of Israeli Jews</a>) supporting the rabbis' ban on rentals to Arabs.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">5) <em>It's just freedom of expression being exercised.</em></span><br />
<br />
When everything else has failed, Israeli Jewish racism will be explained away as an instance, or many instances in this case, of free speech being exercised.<br />
<br />
Of course, there's an asymmetry in the freedom accorded by Zionists to people who want to speak. If it's a rabbi saying that Gentiles were born to serve the Jews -- yes; if it's a British Foreign Office employee saying "fucking Jews, fucking Israelis" -- no.<br />
<br />
It would be good for them to remember that Israel does not grant unlimited freedom of speech to its population, and that there are laws against incitement to hate that could very well be applied to the rabbis who sign weird letters if the country were the democratic paragon it's purported to be.Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2781379104401133933.post-65060655290942038892010-12-30T12:21:00.000-08:002010-12-30T12:43:12.520-08:00"But those Arabs who do serve in the IDF are respected and honored" -- NotWith regard to the Arab population of Israel, there do exist issues. Nobody's denying that, but they're the result of the conflict and of the Arab unwillingness to serve in the Israeli Defense Forces. Those who do serve, however, get the same privileges as the Jews do in all walks of Israeli life.<br />
<br />
This is the kind of nonsense Zionists can peddle with impunity because, logically, we can't trace every last Israeli Arab who served in the army to see if they're granted the same rights as the Jews. We'll have to make do, then, with those who make it to the headlines. A few days ago, Ynet <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4003502,00.html">reported</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b>Arabs flee home due to racist threats</b><br />
<br />
Five residents of the north, <b>four Muslims and a Druze, were forced to leave their apartment in southern Tel Aviv</b> due to threats and persecution by their Jewish neighbors, Ynet learned Thursday.<br />
<br />
"I felt humiliated by the hatred," said Ganem Abbas, <b>the young Druze man, who has served in the IDF</b>.(...)<br />
<br />
[T]hree days ago the friends returned home in the evening to see that their main water pipe had been broken. Gas bottles had been stolen.<br />
<br />
"The landlady told me that people from the neighborhood had threatened to torch the house and attack her if we don't get out, because we're Arabs," Abbas said.<br />
<br />
He also described a particularly humiliating moment. "The neighbors came out and started to yell that they don't want to see Arabs in the neighborhood, and that it is for Jews only," he recounted.(...) <br />
<br />
"This act destroys coexistence. I feel humiliated from this intolerable cruelty. <b>Despite serving in the army and telling the neighbors this</b>, but [sic] they didn't care and only gave us the evil eye. I have heard stories about Arabs who were fired for speaking their mother tongue – even that disturbs the racists."</blockquote><br />
Please note that the young Arab was kicked out of the apartment not because the attackers didn't know that he was an IDF veteran, but in spite of such awareness.<br />
<br />
One can only pity the Druze community, who made many years ago the decision to allow the IDF to recruit their children, maybe in the hope that one day the Jews would accept them as part of the mainstream Israeli society. Bad news for them: Israeli Jews are not interested in <i>any</i> Arab, IDF service or not.<br />
<br />
The bright side, though, is that the Tel Aviv municipality, in a face-saving effort, apologized to the young Druze and offered to find accomodation for him in a less hostile neighborhood.<br />
<br />
Just kidding!Ibrahim Ibn Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839484683464457225noreply@blogger.com7